NASSCO’s history, like other places that build ships in the U.S., had a problem with asbestos. Until the 1970s, ships were constructed and fixed using asbestos parts and products. This material was in insulation, boilers, pipes, ceiling tiles and floors.

Asbestos could handle high heat and prevent fires. Sometimes, they removed asbestos and put it back in when the ships were under repair.

Shipyard employees were not the only workers who handled these products. Other companies that helped with the building also used asbestos. This caused asbestos to get into the air and make the workplace dangerous.

The International Journal of Environmental Health Research published a study in 2021. It found that sailors from five Nordic countries are more than twice as likely to get mesothelioma compared to regular people.

NASSCO Occupational Asbestos Exposure

NASSCO had to defend itself in court over asbestos. A couple claimed that the shipyard made them sick. Aida Savelesky said that her husband Allen worked with asbestos at NASSCO. She got exposed through him, which made her develop mesothelioma.

Aida Savelesky took the shipyard to court and made two arguments. First, she said her husband got close to asbestos while working at NASSCO. This type of exposure is called occupational exposure. The asbestos stuck to his skin, hair, clothes and shoes. This exposed her to asbestos.

In her second argument, Mrs. Savelesky claimed that NASSCO was careless in choosing to use asbestos. She said that because of the shipyard’s actions, she breathed in the asbestos fibers, which caused her to get sick.

In July 2011, the U.S. District Court decided to send the case back to a different court for more review. The outcome is unknown.

Couple reviews Mesothelioma Guide together
Get a Free Mesothelioma Guide
Learn about your diagnosis, top doctors and how to pay for treatment.

NASSCO Employees and NASSCO Lawsuits

In a 2006 case, NASSCO was accused by the Shipyard Workers Union of violating Section 8(a) (1) and (5) of the collective bargaining agreement when the Company refused to allow the union to remove a previously appointed health and safety representative and replace them with a union health and safety representative.

In the 1980s, the yard and the seven unions affiliated with the Shipbuilders Union agreed to the creation of a company paid union health and safety representative. This union representative performed the same duties as the non-union safety representative and worked under the supervision of safety manager just as they did. The one important difference was that the union representative remained a part of the bargaining unit. The company was ordered to allow the unions to select their own representative.

In another case brought by the Shipyard Workers Union the previous year, NASSCO was charged with violating meal and break time laws. The union had documented over 1,000 separation violation claims placed with the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement over a four year period.

In addition to rectifying these violations, the union was trying improve the safety record at NASSCO. An organizer for the Boilermakers Union was quoted in an article as saying that “NASSCO had the worst safety record of any shipyard in the country.”

NASSCO and OSHA Violations

From the 1970s to the year 2000, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited NASSCO. They found problems that NASSCO knew about but refused to fix.

There were hundreds of issues, including asbestos. The yard was aware of the asbestos contamination. NASSCO didn’t get rid of it when they were supposed to, as OSHA found out later.