Wisconsin Appeals Court Vacates $1.5 Million Judgment Against Brake Manufacturer

Legislation & Litigation
Reading Time: 3 mins
Publication Date: 01/24/2012
Fact Checked
Our fact-checking process begins with a thorough review of all sources to ensure they are high quality. Then we cross-check the facts with original medical or scientific reports published by those sources, or we validate the facts with reputable news organizations, medical and scientific experts and other health experts. Each page includes all sources for full transparency.
Reviewed

Asbestos.com is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource

The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com has provided patients and their loved ones the most updated and reliable information on mesothelioma and asbestos exposure since 2006.

Our team of Patient Advocates includes a medical doctor, a registered nurse, health services administrators, veterans, VA-accredited Claims Agents, an oncology patient navigator and hospice care expert. Their combined expertise means we help any mesothelioma patient or loved one through every step of their cancer journey.

More than 30 contributors, including mesothelioma doctors, survivors, health care professionals and other experts, have peer-reviewed our website and written unique research-driven articles to ensure you get the highest-quality medical and health information.

About The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com

  • Assisting mesothelioma patients and their loved ones since 2006.
  • Helps more than 50% of mesothelioma patients diagnosed annually in the U.S.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed mesothelioma and support organization.
Learn More About Us

Testimonials

"My family has only the highest compliment for the assistance and support that we received from The Mesothelioma Center. This is a staff of compassionate and knowledgeable individuals who respect what your family is experiencing and who go the extra mile to make an unfortunate diagnosis less stressful. Information and assistance were provided by The Mesothelioma Center at no cost to our family."
Lashawn
Mesothelioma patient’s daughter
  • Google Review Rating
  • BBB Review Rating

How to Cite Asbestos.com’s Article

APA

Hall, M. (2020, October 16). Wisconsin Appeals Court Vacates $1.5 Million Judgment Against Brake Manufacturer. Asbestos.com. Retrieved February 3, 2023, from https://www.asbestos.com/blog/2012/01/24/wisconsin-appeals-court-vacates-1-5-million-judgment-against-brake-manufacturer/

MLA

Hall, Mark. "Wisconsin Appeals Court Vacates $1.5 Million Judgment Against Brake Manufacturer." Asbestos.com, 16 Oct 2020, https://www.asbestos.com/blog/2012/01/24/wisconsin-appeals-court-vacates-1-5-million-judgment-against-brake-manufacturer/.

Chicago

Hall, Mark. "Wisconsin Appeals Court Vacates $1.5 Million Judgment Against Brake Manufacturer." Asbestos.com. Last modified October 16, 2020. https://www.asbestos.com/blog/2012/01/24/wisconsin-appeals-court-vacates-1-5-million-judgment-against-brake-manufacturer/.

For the second time in two months, a court has made headlines by reversing course on a high-profile asbestos case. First Mississippi, now Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals recently vacated a $1.5 million judgment against Pneumo Abex LLC.

Here are the details:

The daughter of John Pender, a crane worker who died from mesothelioma, alleged he was exposed to asbestos in brake shoes made by Abex. For 41 years, Pender worked as a painter and glass setter for a company that made cranes. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in May 2006 and died later that month.

His daughter sued a number of companies that supplied asbestos-containing products to his employer. Key evidence in the case included testimony from a former co-worker and invoices for Abex brake shoes.

The former co-worker, who installed brake shoes in the cranes, testified that his job involved grinding the shoes. The process left the cranes covered in grease and dust from the shoes.

Pender cleaned the residue off of the cranes before painting them. The invoices submitted in the case showed that Abex supplied brake shoes to Pender’s employer while he worked there.

A jury awarded almost $1.5 million to Pender’s family, and Abex appealed.

The Appeals Court held that there was no evidence that the brake shoes were used in the building where Pender worked. Abex was one of at least seven vendors who sold brake shoes to the crane company.

Further, the company had several plants, but none of the evidence or testimony presented placed the shoes in the building where Pender worked. According to the court, the evidence presented at trial was not enough to take the plaintiff’s claims “out of the realm of speculation and conjecture.”

This case is significant because it highlights some types of evidence that can be used in an asbestos case. Presenting Pender’s case involved digging through his employer’s records and getting testimony from a former co-worker. This evidence successfully persuaded jury.

Unfortunately for the plaintiff, the appeals court found that more evidence was needed to reasonably infer that Pender was exposed to asbestos from Abex’s brake shoes.

The appeals court distinguished this case from another asbestos case, Zielinski v, A.P. Green Indus. Inc., 611 N.W. 2d 659 (2000). In that case, the court held that there was enough evidence to infer that the plaintiff had been exposed to the defendant’s asbestos-laden product.

Zielinski also provided evidence that the product had been purchased from the defendant and testimony from a witness at the plant. However, in that case, there was sufficient evidence that the product had been purchased for use in the plant where the plaintiff worked.

Tracing asbestos exposure can be challenging. Evidence from co-workers and vendor records may help strengthen a case.

In some instances, courts may infer that the plaintiff’s injury was caused by exposure to the defendant’s product. Evidence that the worker was present at the time and in the place where the defendant supplied asbestos-laden products can be persuasive.

But as the Abex case suggests, there may be limits to how much a jury will be allowed to infer from the evidence.

Each state’s laws and the facts of each case differ. So be sure to talk to an experienced mesothelioma lawyer about your specific case.

legal scale of justice icon
Get Financial Assistance
Access Trust Funds, Grants & Compensation for Mesothelioma