Proposed Federal FACT Act Addresses Concerns About Asbestos Trusts

Legislation & Litigation
Reading Time: 3 mins
Publication Date: 06/08/2012
Fact Checked
Our fact-checking process begins with a thorough review of all sources to ensure they are high quality. Then we cross-check the facts with original medical or scientific reports published by those sources, or we validate the facts with reputable news organizations, medical and scientific experts and other health experts. Each page includes all sources for full transparency.
Reviewed is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource

The Mesothelioma Center at has provided patients and their loved ones the most updated and reliable information on mesothelioma and asbestos exposure since 2006.

Our team of Patient Advocates includes a medical doctor, a registered nurse, health services administrators, veterans, VA-accredited Claims Agents, an oncology patient navigator and hospice care expert. Their combined expertise means we help any mesothelioma patient or loved one through every step of their cancer journey.

More than 30 contributors, including mesothelioma doctors, survivors, health care professionals and other experts, have peer-reviewed our website and written unique research-driven articles to ensure you get the highest-quality medical and health information.

About The Mesothelioma Center at

  • Assisting mesothelioma patients and their loved ones since 2006.
  • Helps more than 50% of mesothelioma patients diagnosed annually in the U.S.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed mesothelioma and support organization.
Learn More About Us


"My family has only the highest compliment for the assistance and support that we received from The Mesothelioma Center. This is a staff of compassionate and knowledgeable individuals who respect what your family is experiencing and who go the extra mile to make an unfortunate diagnosis less stressful. Information and assistance were provided by The Mesothelioma Center at no cost to our family."
Mesothelioma patient’s daughter
  • Google Review Rating
  • BBB Review Rating

How to Cite’s Article


Marshall, K. (2022, December 16). Proposed Federal FACT Act Addresses Concerns About Asbestos Trusts. Retrieved February 8, 2023, from


Marshall, Karen. "Proposed Federal FACT Act Addresses Concerns About Asbestos Trusts.", 16 Dec 2022,


Marshall, Karen. "Proposed Federal FACT Act Addresses Concerns About Asbestos Trusts." Last modified December 16, 2022.

Last fall, a House Judiciary Subcommittee held a hearing on transparency in asbestos trust claims. As expected, that hearing foreshadowed the introduction of new asbestos legislation.

The legislation, known as the Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency (FACT) Act of 2012 (H.R. 4369), was recently the topic of another hearing. It represents the first time Congress has taken up the issue of asbestos compensation in years.

But before you get excited, keep reading.

What Would the Bill Do?

The FACT Act would amend the U.S. bankruptcy code by creating a public reporting requirement for asbestos bankruptcy trusts. The trusts would be required to file quarterly reports with the bankruptcy court containing detailed information on asbestos trust claims.

Reports would be made available to public.

Information contained in the reports would include the name and exposure history of each claimant and their asbestos exposure history. If requested, trusts would also be required to provide asbestos litigation defendants with claims payment information.

Is This Bill Necessary?

It’s not clear how useful this bill is to anyone other than asbestos litigation defendants.

What is clear is the bill doesn’t propose a national compensation system to benefit asbestos victims. Congress has tried multiple times to pass the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution (FAIR) Act.

That legislation would have offered a comprehensive solution for compensating asbestos victims. The FAIR Act was last introduced in 2006, but it never became law.

Unlike FAIR, the proposed FACT Act isn’t even concerned with compensating victims. It’s just an effort to compile information about how much trusts are paying claimants.

The bill’s supporters, mainly asbestos litigation defendants, say it’s needed to keep plaintiffs from “double dipping.” They claim that giving them access to trust claim details will prevent claimants from recovering twice — once from trusts and a second time from lawsuits.

But this isn’t a legitimate concern for at least three reasons:

  1. The trust system is separate from the litigation system. Claimants have the right to recover from every defendant responsible for their injuries. But trusts only compensate claims against companies who’ve gotten bankruptcy protection. A claimant can’t settle with a company through a trust and then sue the same company in court. That’s the whole point of bankruptcy protection. For more information, see my earlier post on the trust claim process.
  2. Trusts already prevent abuse. Trustees manage their assets for the benefit of current and future claimants. This means they’re obligated to make sure the trust has enough to pay all claims. That’s why trust procedures are designed to avoid fraud and abuse.
  3. Asbestos lawsuit defendants already have access to trust claim information. Defendants can usually get the information through discovery. Some states even require plaintiffs to disclose information about trust claims when they file their lawsuits. Plaintiffs face penalties if they don’t.

So what would H.R.4369 really do? Apparently, it would just let asbestos defendants bypass court procedures to get information on how trusts distribute their $36 billion.

The truth is this: the court system already gives asbestos lawsuit defendants access to whatever information they need about individual trust claims. Defendants just want more information about all asbestos trust claims, including claims by people who haven’t sued them.

And they want the convenience of having trusts foot the bill to provide the information.

What Do Victims Have to Say?

I was concerned that last fall’s hearing didn’t include input from asbestos victims. Fortunately, the subcommittee did a better job this time around.

Next week we’ll look at claimants’ input and how it could affect the chances of H.R. 4369 becoming law.

legal scale of justice icon
Get Financial Assistance
Access Trust Funds, Grants & Compensation for Mesothelioma