How Past Litigation Results and Current Trends Influence Asbestos Trusts

Legislation & Litigation
Reading Time: 3 mins
Publication Date: 02/15/2013
Fact Checked
Our fact-checking process begins with a thorough review of all sources to ensure they are high quality. Then we cross-check the facts with original medical or scientific reports published by those sources, or we validate the facts with reputable news organizations, medical and scientific experts and other health experts. Each page includes all sources for full transparency.
Reviewed is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource

The Mesothelioma Center at has provided patients and their loved ones the most updated and reliable information on mesothelioma and asbestos exposure since 2006.

Our team of Patient Advocates includes a medical doctor, a registered nurse, health services administrators, veterans, VA-accredited Claims Agents, an oncology patient navigator and hospice care expert. Their combined expertise means we help any mesothelioma patient or loved one through every step of their cancer journey.

More than 30 contributors, including mesothelioma doctors, survivors, health care professionals and other experts, have peer-reviewed our website and written unique research-driven articles to ensure you get the highest-quality medical and health information.

About The Mesothelioma Center at

  • Assisting mesothelioma patients and their loved ones since 2006.
  • Helps more than 50% of mesothelioma patients diagnosed annually in the U.S.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed mesothelioma and support organization.
Learn More About Us


"My family has only the highest compliment for the assistance and support that we received from The Mesothelioma Center. This is a staff of compassionate and knowledgeable individuals who respect what your family is experiencing and who go the extra mile to make an unfortunate diagnosis less stressful. Information and assistance were provided by The Mesothelioma Center at no cost to our family."
Mesothelioma patient’s daughter
  • Google Review Rating
  • BBB Review Rating

How to Cite’s Article


Marshall, K. (2020, October 16). How Past Litigation Results and Current Trends Influence Asbestos Trusts. Retrieved February 8, 2023, from


Marshall, Karen. "How Past Litigation Results and Current Trends Influence Asbestos Trusts.", 16 Oct 2020,


Marshall, Karen. "How Past Litigation Results and Current Trends Influence Asbestos Trusts." Last modified October 16, 2020.

We’ve already mentioned how U.S. asbestos tort litigation and asbestos bankruptcy trusts are really two different legal arenas. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that what happens in one arena won’t affect what goes on in the other.

This week begins the first of two posts that take a closer look at some ways asbestos personal injury lawsuits and asbestos bankruptcy trusts can influence each other. We’ll start with the influence of litigation trends on asbestos trusts and another look at the Owens Corning bankruptcy.

Using Past Litigation Results to Determine Future Trust Claimant Needs

The most obvious influence from asbestos lawsuits is the need to create a trust in the first place. As we explained in detail last week, section 524(g) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code allows courts to halt future lawsuits if there will likely be “substantial future demands” and a trust is created to handle those demands.

Creating an asbestos trust ends further personal injury litigation against a company, but past litigation remains important. That’s because past litigation can influence asbestos bankruptcy estimation.

Remember that bankruptcy proceedings also include non-asbestos claims for fixed amounts, like the amount owed on a bank note. But there’s no fixed amount available for an asbestos claim. However, amounts awarded in past litigation can give the court a clue about how much current and future asbestos claimants can expect for their injuries.

Considering Litigation Trends

There are limits to how much weight past litigation has on the estimation process. This is because litigation trends are constantly evolving and courts have discretion to take those trends into account. That’s what happened in the Owens Corning bankruptcy case.

In its estimation ruling, the district court in that case determined that several factors had “skewed” the results of past litigation. Those factors included:

  • Overpayment to “unimpaired” claimants,
  • “Group lawsuits” that bundled the most severe claims with “unimpaired cases,” resulting in higher awards for claims that had little evidence; and
  • Erroneous lung X-ray readings by biased “B-readers” (physicians who are certified to do readings).

These and similar issues would likely be avoided in the future thanks to changes in court rules (e.g., creating separate dockets based on severity of illness, prioritizing the most severe claims, and creating medical criteria for filing claims). As a result, future claimants could expect different award amounts.

So when it came time to estimate how much would be available for asbestos bankruptcy trust claims, the court disregarded testimony from the Asbestos Claimant Committee (ACC) that estimated total asbestos liability at $11.1 billion. That estimate was based on past litigation, but didn’t adequately accounting for recent litigation trends.

Instead, the court was persuaded by expert testimony that adjusted past litigation amounts to reflect more recent changes to the litigation process.  Using that testimony, the court estimated total asbestos liability at $7 billion, which was $4.1 billion less than the ACC expert’s estimate.

Next week, we’ll consider how trends in trust claims may impact asbestos litigation.

legal scale of justice icon
Get Financial Assistance
Access Trust Funds, Grants & Compensation for Mesothelioma