Judge Threatens Plaintiff Attorneys with Trustee in Specialty Products and Bondex CaseLegislation & Litigation
Asbestos.com is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource
The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com has provided patients and their loved ones the most updated and reliable information on mesothelioma and asbestos exposure since 2006.
Our team of Patient Advocates includes a medical doctor, a registered nurse, health services administrators, veterans, VA-accredited Claims Agents, an oncology patient navigator and hospice care expert. Their combined expertise means we help any mesothelioma patient or loved one through every step of their cancer journey.
More than 30 contributors, including mesothelioma doctors, survivors, health care professionals and other experts, have peer-reviewed our website and written unique research-driven articles to ensure you get the highest-quality medical and health information.
About The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com
- Assisting mesothelioma patients and their loved ones since 2006.
- Helps more than 50% of mesothelioma patients diagnosed annually in the U.S.
- A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
- 5-star reviewed mesothelioma and support organization.
"My family has only the highest compliment for the assistance and support that we received from The Mesothelioma Center. This is a staff of compassionate and knowledgeable individuals who respect what your family is experiencing and who go the extra mile to make an unfortunate diagnosis less stressful. Information and assistance were provided by The Mesothelioma Center at no cost to our family."LashawnMesothelioma patient’s daughter
How to Cite Asbestos.com’s Article
Franz, F. (2020, October 16). Judge Threatens Plaintiff Attorneys with Trustee in Specialty Products and Bondex Case. Asbestos.com. Retrieved February 4, 2023, from https://www.asbestos.com/news/2011/04/19/bankruptcy-proceedings-for-specialty-products-bondex-faces-delays/
Franz, Faith. "Judge Threatens Plaintiff Attorneys with Trustee in Specialty Products and Bondex Case." Asbestos.com, 16 Oct 2020, https://www.asbestos.com/news/2011/04/19/bankruptcy-proceedings-for-specialty-products-bondex-faces-delays/.
Franz, Faith. "Judge Threatens Plaintiff Attorneys with Trustee in Specialty Products and Bondex Case." Asbestos.com. Last modified October 16, 2020. https://www.asbestos.com/news/2011/04/19/bankruptcy-proceedings-for-specialty-products-bondex-faces-delays/.
In May 2010, Specialty Products and Bondex Inc., a subsidiary of RPM International, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection from asbestos claims.
Under bankruptcy law in the United States, companies seeking bankruptcy can set up a trust fund to compensate any current and future claimants in asbestos cases.
Bondex and Specialty Products previously manufactured and distributed chemical product lines, insulation, finishing systems and powder coating. Exposure to asbestos-containing insulation has been linked to the development of diseases such as malignant mesothelioma.
Specialty Products, and its subsidiary Bondex, have claimed liability for up to 25,000 asbestos claims, which are expected to exceed $500 million. Because both Specialty Products and Bondex are no longer operational companies, the bankruptcy judge has halted any further litigation while a trust is funded. Provisions in bankruptcy law allow companies that are not in bankruptcy to make contributions to a trust and be released of liability in any claims.
However, before a trust is completely set up and funded, over 75 percent of the plaintiffs currently undertaking lawsuits must agree to the reorganization plan. Both companies intend to negotiate with the asbestos victims so the trust can provide adequate funding for legitimate health claims. Since the discovery motions in November, the judge has held five hearings to set up a bankruptcy trust. None have been approved, due to opposition from asbestos lawyers and their clients.
On April 18, 2011, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Judith K. Fitzgerald threatened to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee as a result of the inability of the plaintiff lawyers to reach an agreement with the defense. One of the lead attorneys for the plaintiffs has long argued that the bankruptcy case has been improperly handled from the beginning and is opposed to the halt on lawsuits.