Study: Preoperative Chemotherapy Useful for MesotheliomaResearch & Clinical Trials
Asbestos.com is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource
The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com has provided patients and their loved ones the most updated and reliable information on mesothelioma and asbestos exposure since 2006.
Our team of Patient Advocates includes a medical doctor, a registered nurse, health services administrators, veterans, VA-accredited Claims Agents, an oncology patient navigator and hospice care expert. Their combined expertise means we help any mesothelioma patient or loved one through every step of their cancer journey.
More than 30 contributors, including mesothelioma doctors, survivors, health care professionals and other experts, have peer-reviewed our website and written unique research-driven articles to ensure you get the highest-quality medical and health information.
About The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com
- Assisting mesothelioma patients and their loved ones since 2006.
- Helps more than 50% of mesothelioma patients diagnosed annually in the U.S.
- A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
- 5-star reviewed mesothelioma and support organization.
"My family has only the highest compliment for the assistance and support that we received from The Mesothelioma Center. This is a staff of compassionate and knowledgeable individuals who respect what your family is experiencing and who go the extra mile to make an unfortunate diagnosis less stressful. Information and assistance were provided by The Mesothelioma Center at no cost to our family."LashawnMesothelioma patient’s daughter
How to Cite Asbestos.com’s Article
Povtak, T. (2022, December 16). Study: Preoperative Chemotherapy Useful for Mesothelioma. Asbestos.com. Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://www.asbestos.com/news/2017/12/13/preoperative-bidirectional-chemotherapy-mesothelioma/
Povtak, Tim. "Study: Preoperative Chemotherapy Useful for Mesothelioma." Asbestos.com, 16 Dec 2022, https://www.asbestos.com/news/2017/12/13/preoperative-bidirectional-chemotherapy-mesothelioma/.
Povtak, Tim. "Study: Preoperative Chemotherapy Useful for Mesothelioma." Asbestos.com. Last modified December 16, 2022. https://www.asbestos.com/news/2017/12/13/preoperative-bidirectional-chemotherapy-mesothelioma/.
Oncologists in France are exploring the use of bidirectional chemotherapy as a pre-operative tool for peritoneal mesothelioma, increasing the eligibility of patients for aggressive surgery.
Their bidirectional chemotherapy — which typically includes a pemetrexed (Alimta) and cisplatin combination — is delivered directly into the abdominal cavity to reduce tumor burden and make cytoreductive surgery more manageable.
Doctors at Gustave Roussy, one of Europe’s premier cancer centers, documented this novel use in a study published in the November issue of Annals of Surgical Oncology.
“This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of bidirectional chemotherapy for downstaging initially unresectable MPM [malignant peritoneal mesothelioma],” the authors wrote. “The study demonstrated it is a well-tolerated and effective treatment.”
According to the study, half of the previously unresectable or borderline cases became eligible for surgery after bidirectional chemotherapy, which led to a longer overall median survival.
“The aim of bidirectional chemotherapy is to increase the local cytotoxic effect with the intent to increase the rate of complete resection,” the authors wrote. “Downsizing the extent of the peritoneal disease with an efficient preoperative treatment represents a pivotal issue.”
Surgery and HIPEC Proven Effective
A combination of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the optimal treatment for peritoneal mesothelioma, lifting median survival rates to more than five years.
The problem, though, is the majority of patients diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma are not eligible for surgery, typically because of tumor spread (metastasis) or overall health issues that would make it counterproductive.
Without surgery, patients receive only palliative intravenous chemotherapy, which has been relatively ineffective, producing a five-year survival rate of 10 percent, according to the study.
The French study notes bidirectional chemotherapy has improved the outcome for patients with borderline resectability and allowed patients with previously unresectable status to undergo surgery.
More Qualifying for Surgery
The study began with 20 patients who either were borderline resectable (12) or unresectable (8).
After bidirectional chemotherapy, nine of the borderline and two of the unresectable patients qualified for a complete resection and HIPEC.
The survival rate for the entire cohort at one and two years was 83.1 percent and 65.8 percent, respectively.
Additionally, the overall survival rate at two years was 83 percent for those getting surgery and HIPEC, compared to just 44.4 percent for patients who had only the bidirectional chemotherapy.
The median disease-free survival for those having surgery was 25.5 months. Four of the nine who had only the bidirectional chemotherapy died within 14 months.
Bidirectional chemotherapy has been used successfully with ovarian cancer, although it is not universally accepted.
Sugarbaker Pioneered Use with Mesothelioma
Dr. Paul Sugarbaker at the Washington Cancer Institute pioneered the use of bidirectional chemotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma, but using it post-surgery instead of pre-surgery.
Sugarbaker published a study in 2012 detailing the effectiveness of adjuvant bidirectional chemotherapy following HIPEC. It was delivered with intraoperative intraperitoneal port placement.
Earlier this year, Sugarbaker published another report in the European Journal of Surgical Oncology detailing a similar procedure that produced a five-year survival rate of almost 75 percent.
In addition to HIPEC, his patients received normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC) and early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC).
“Preoperative treatment represents a major challenge in the attempt to improve the likelihood of curative-intent surgery,” the French authors wrote. “These good survival outcomes need to be cautiously assessed and deserve further investigation.”