Cancer Treatment Less Effective in Older Patients
As age increases, so does the risk for cancer. More than half of all cancer cases occur in people over 65.
This is especially true for mesothelioma. The average age at diagnosis for pleural mesothelioma — the most common form of the disease — is 69.
Despite cancer being more common among the elderly, many cancer treatments work best in younger patients.
Researchers now have an idea of why certain cancer treatments don’t work as well in older patients.
These important findings were published in June in the medical journal Cell Reports.
“While it is clear that primary T cell responses decline in the elderly, there is little understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underpin this dysfunction,” the authors wrote.
According to the study, we now know a certain subset of immune system T cells lose their ability to respond to threats as we age.
The Aging Immune System
Immune system changes occur as we age. Health experts know this can make us more vulnerable to a number of disease and conditions, including the seasonal flu, colds, other infections and food borne illness.
Research has shown immune changes also make us more prone to cancer as the years accumulate.
In younger people, a single cancer cell often is recognized by the immune system as dangerous and is destroyed before it can form a tumor.
With age, the body may fail to recognize cancer as a threat, and the immune system fails to contain the disease.
Immune Cells: Wrong Kind and Less Responsive
These same changes also appear to diminish the ability of immune cells to respond to treatments designed to harness immunity to fight cancer.
The laboratory of professor Nicole La Gruta at Monash University in Australia used a mouse model to better understand why this happens.
The new study revealed virtual memory CD8+ T cells make up about 5 percent of immune T cells in young people.
With age, people accumulate many more virtual memory cells, but they do not create a strong immune response in older people.
Over time, the body also loses large numbers of very active immune cells known as naive T cells.
In younger animals and humans, about 90 percent of this T-cell group are the naive type. In older individuals — often considered to be anyone over 65 — this number drops to 30 percent.
Naive T cells are important for creating a strong immune response to cancer.
As a result, treatment options that depend on a strong immune system response, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, cancer vaccines and monoclonal antibodies, do not work as well in older patients.
Because the majority of mesothelioma patients are older when diagnosed, their bodies are less able to respond well to immunotherapy.
According to the study authors, these changes in immunity likely are linked to increasing levels of inflammation often associated with aging.
While a certain amount of inflammation will occur with aging, lifestyle and health behavior choices are important, too.
In particular, the microbiome — the trillions of bacteria, viruses, fungi and other microbes that inhabit the human body — plays an important role in immune function and inflammation.
A more varied microbiome is associated with lower levels of inflammation. Studies show a healthy microbiome seems to support a better response to immunotherapy, too.
The study authors note the new understanding of the interplay between aging, immune function and cancer treatment will lead to better therapies tailored to meet the needs of older individuals.
This should lead to a future of cancer treatment in which everyone — old and young — receives the most benefit possible from all appropriate therapies.
Share This Article
16 Cited Article Sources
National Cancer Institute. (2015, April 29). Age and Cancer Risk.
Retrieved from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/age
American Cancer Society. (2016, February 17). What Are the Key Statistics About Malignant Mesothelioma.
Retrieved from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/malignant-mesothelioma/about/key-statistics.html
Quinn, K.M. et al. (2018). Age-Related Decline in Primary CD8 T Cell Responses Is Associated with the Development of Senescence in Virtual Memory CD8 T Cells. Cell Reports, 23, 3512. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.057
Monash University. La Gruta Laboratory.
Retrieved from: http://www.med.monash.edu.au/biochem/labs/lagruta/index.html
Science Daily. (2018, June 19). Why older people respond poorly to cancer treatment.
Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180619122958.htm
Science Daily. (2018, March 3). Antibiotics may impact cancer treatment efficacy.
Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180303090356.htm
Thompson, J. et al. (2017). P1.07-008 Microbiome & Immunotherapy: Antibiotic Use Is Associated with Inferior Survival for Lung Cancer Patients Receiving PD-1 Inhibitors. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 12, S1998. DOI:
Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.926
Buchta Rosean, C.M. and Rutkowski, M.R. (2017). The influence of the commensal microbiota on distal tumor-promoting inflammation. Semin Immunol, 32, 62-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.06.002
Francescone, R. et al (2014). Microbiome, inflammation, and cancer. Cancer J, 20, 181-9. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000048
Vétizou, M. et al. (2015). Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science, 350, 1079-84. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad1329
Sivan, A. et al. (2015). Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science, 350, 1084-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4255
Routy, B. et al. (2017, November 2). Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.aan3706
Parekh, P.J. et al. (2017, December 4). The Effects of Sleep on the Commensal Microbiota: Eyes Wide Open? J Clin Gastroenterol, DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000965
Codella, R. et al. (2017, November 28). Exercise has the guts: How physical activity may positively modulate gut microbiota in chronic and immune-based diseases. Dig Liver Dis, pii: S1590-8658(17)31312-9, DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.11.016
Cotillard, A. et al. (2013, August 29). Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness. Nature, 500, 585-88. DOI: 10.1038/nature12480
- Nettleton et al. (2016, October 1). Reshaping the gut microbiota: Impact of low calorie sweeteners and the link to insulin resistance? Physiology & Behavior, 164, 488-93, DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.029