Asbestos Fume Hoods and Laboratory Hoods

Fume Hoods

Years Produced: 1900s – 1980s

Asbestos was once common in laboratory equipment because of its resistance to heat and chemical corrosion. Though most lab equipment is no longer manufactured with the toxic mineral, asbestos-containing fume hood linings remain in many laboratories throughout the country.

For most of the 20th century, asbestos was thought to be indispensable to the modern science laboratory. The mineral has a soft, fibrous consistency that allows it to be woven into fabric and easily mixed into other substances — yet on a microscopic level, asbestos fibers are almost indestructible, resisting heat, chemical corrosion and electricity.

The unfortunate irony is generations of researchers, professors and students relied on asbestos to keep them safe before the mineral’s cancer-causing effects became public knowledge.

Manufacturers used asbestos in many types of the following types of laboratory equipment.

  • Fireproof gloves, mitts and sleeves:

    Asbestos fibers were woven into safety gear as well as protective coverings for tongs, clamps and other tools.

  • Bunsen burner mats and gauze pads:

    Bunsen burners create a gas flame to quickly heat laboratory samples. Asbestos was used in the gauze pads that support samples above the flame, as well as the safety mats placed below the burners.

  • Equipment insulation linings:

    Laboratory machines, such as ovens and centrifuges, sometimes included asbestos as an internal insulating material. Pure asbestos fibers were also used to filter strong chemicals that would corrode any other kind of thin filter fibers.

  • Laboratory fume hoods:

    A fume hood is a storage unit for dangerous chemicals that uses a ventilation system to draw chemical fumes away from laboratory workers. Many older fume hoods are lined with a type of asbestos cement known as transite.

In the past, it was common for worn asbestos laboratory equipment to release asbestos dust, putting everyone in the lab at risk of harmful exposure. Today, there is still a risk of laboratory asbestos exposure whenever transite-lined fume hoods are damaged or removed.

Exposed to an Asbestos-Containing Product?

Our Patient Advocates can answer your questions about asbestos exposure and help you find a top attorney.


At A Glance

  • Places Used: Laboratories and industrial settings
  • Toxicity: Low
  • Asbestos Use Banned: No
  • Friable: No

At the turn of the 20th century, the acceleration of scientific advancement in chemistry and physics created a growing demand for modern laboratory equipment. Chester Garfield Fisher was one of the early entrepreneurs to respond to this need, founding the Fisher Scientific Company in 1902. Fisher Scientific became an industry leader in the making of laboratory equipment, and like many manufacturing companies of the time period, it used asbestos in many of its products.

In the first half of the 1900s, asbestos solidified its reputation for making products safer and more durable, and laboratory researchers proved just as enthusiastic about safety as architects and shipbuilders. Bunsen burners were already well established in science laboratories, and asbestos-containing accessories and protective gear quickly became just as ubiquitous.

In 1936, the Labconco Corporation unveiled the first commercially available fume hood. Until this point, chemists throughout history had relied on less sophisticated ways of protecting themselves from chemical fumes and often been poisoned by their research materials as a result. The invention of the fume hood represented a leap forward in laboratory safety, but it suffered an unfortunate step back when transite became a common lining for fume hoods.

Transite had originally been the brand name for a product the Johns Manville Corporation introduced in 1929, but over time the word came to be used generically to refer to any similar asbestos cement product. In addition to Labconco, manufacturers of fume hoods with transite linings included Kewaunee Scientific Corporation, Longo Labs and Hamilton Manufacturing.

As the health hazards of asbestos exposure came to light in the 1970s and 1980s, the use of asbestos was phased out in the manufacture of laboratory equipment. However, older research laboratories still commonly contain asbestos cement products such as countertops and fume hood linings as well as machinery with internal asbestos insulation.

The following prominent universities have published safety guidelines concerning asbestos materials in laboratories and other places on campus:

  • Cornell University
  • Stanford University
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of Florida
  • University of Michigan
  • University of Texas at Dallas
  • University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee


Asbestos-related diseases are caused by the accumulation of microscopic asbestos fibers in the body, usually in and around the lungs. Because the mineral has no scent or taste, a person can easily inhale asbestos dust without realizing it. Asbestos-related diseases, such as asbestosis and mesothelioma, typically do not present symptoms until decades after exposure.

The level of exposure risk associated with an asbestos-containing material depends on whether the material is friable or nonfriable. A friable material can be crumbled by hand pressure, producing fine dust and debris. In decades past, asbestos gloves, mats and gauze pads often became friable through age and use, exposing many researchers, science teachers and students to inhalable asbestos dust.

The transite linings that remain in some old laboratory fume hoods are generally not considered friable, but asbestos contaminated dust can still be released if the hood linings are damaged, cut or drilled into. As with all asbestos-containing materials, any work affecting transite fume hood linings should be left to licensed asbestos abatement professionals.


In 2005, a former employee of Fisher Scientific, George Baroni, developed mesothelioma. He had been exposed to asbestos while working for the manufacturer from 1959 to 1994. Baroni did not live to see the trial, but the jury ultimately awarded his family $226,000.

A former teacher named James Herbet also filed a lawsuit against Fisher Scientific in 2012 after he was diagnosed with mesothelioma. Herbet argued he had been exposed to asbestos while using Fisher Scientific’s laboratory equipment in his classrooms from 1979 to 2002. A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, however, because the American school where Herbet had worked was located overseas.

Additional Resources

Free VA Claims Assistance Get Help Now
Qualify for Free Medical Care Get Help Now
Get Help Paying for Treatment & More Learn More

Daniel King joined in 2017. He comes from a military family and attended high school on a military base. He feels a close connection to veterans, military families and the many hardships they face. As an investigative writer with interests in mesothelioma research and environmental issues, he seeks to educate others about the dangers of asbestos exposure to protect them from the deadly carcinogen linked to asbestos-related conditions.

  1. Cornell University -- Safe Fume Hood Use Guide. (n.p). Retrieved from
  2. University of Michigan -- Asbestos. (n.p). Retrieved from
  3. University of Florida -- Chemical Fume Hoods. (2012 June 21). Retrieved from
  4. Cornell University Environmental Health and Safety -- Chapter -- – Engr Controls. (2011). Retrieved from
  5. University of Texas at Dallas -- Chemical and Hazardous Materials Safety. (Modified - 2012 April). Retrieved from
  6. The University of British Columbia -- Department of Civil Engineering -- Facilities and Resources. (n.p). Retrieved from
  7. WorkSafeBC -- Safe Work Practices For Asbestos Laboratories. (2008). Retrieved from
  8. Kewaunee Scientific Corporation -- Laboratory Furniture and Fume Hoods. (n.p). Retrieved from
  9. Lab Manager Magazine -- Evolution of Fume Hoods. (2011 December 9). Retrieved from
  10. Mills, E. Ph.D. & Sartor, D. P.E. Energy Use and Savings Potential for Laboratory Fume Hoods. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. (2006 April). Retrieved from
  11. Manik, C. & Jingpeng, P. High Performance Low Flow Fume Hood Design. ESCO Laboratory Fume Hood Division. (n.p). Retrieved from
  12. University of Illinois at Chicago -- UIC's Top Ten Chemical Fume Hood Questions. (n.p). Retrieved from
  13. Occupational Safety & Health Administration -- Laboratory Safety Chemical Fume Hoods. (2011 October). Retrieved from
  14. Furr, A.K. CRC Handbook of Laboratory Safety, 5th Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000.
  15. Garcia, E.D. (2013, January). Asbestos Exposure in the Research Laboratory. Retrieved from
  16. Lane Memorial Library. (n.d.).History of Fisher Scientific. Retrieved from
  17. Stanford Environmental Health and Safety. (n.d.). Asbestos Fact Sheet. Retrieved from
  18. Top Class Actions. (2014, April 28). Federal Judge Recommends Couple Take Asbestos Lawsuit to Indonesia. Retrieved from
  19. University of Florida Environmental Health and Safety. (n.d.). Chemical Fume Hoods. Retrieved from
  20. University of Manchester Safety Services. (2014, November). Guidance on Asbestos in Equipment. Retrieved from

Share Our Page

View our resources for patients and families

Get Help Today
Get Your Free Mesothelioma Guide