Asbestos was once common in laboratory equipment because of its resistance to heat and chemical corrosion. Though most lab equipment is no longer manufactured with the toxic mineral, asbestos-containing fume hood linings remain in many laboratories throughout the country.
Years Produced: 1900s – 1980s
For most of the 20th century, asbestos was thought to be indispensable to the modern science laboratory. The mineral has a soft, fibrous consistency that allows it to be woven into fabric and easily mixed into other substances — yet on a microscopic level, asbestos fibers are almost indestructible, resisting heat, chemical corrosion and electricity.
The unfortunate irony is generations of researchers, professors and students relied on asbestos to keep them safe before the mineral’s cancer-causing effects became public knowledge.
At a Glance
Manufacturers used asbestos in many types of laboratory equipment, including:
Fireproof gloves, mitts and sleeves:
Asbestos fibers were woven into safety gear as well as protective coverings for tongs, clamps and other tools.
Bunsen burner mats and gauze pads:
Bunsen burners create a gas flame to quickly heat laboratory samples. Asbestos was used in the gauze pads that support samples above the flame, as well as the safety mats placed below the burners.
Equipment insulation linings:
Laboratory machines, such as ovens and centrifuges, sometimes included asbestos as an internal insulating material. Pure asbestos fibers were also used to filter strong chemicals that would corrode any other kind of thin filter fibers.
Laboratory fume hoods:
A fume hood is a storage unit for dangerous chemicals that uses a ventilation system to draw chemical fumes away from laboratory workers. Many older fume hoods are lined with a type of asbestos cement known as transite.
In the past, it was common for worn-out asbestos laboratory equipment to release asbestos dust, putting everyone in the lab at risk of harmful exposure. Today, there is still a risk of laboratory asbestos exposure whenever transite-lined fume hoods are damaged or removed.
Our Patient Advocates can answer your questions about asbestos exposure and help you find a top attorney.
At the turn of the 20th century, the acceleration of scientific advancement in chemistry and physics created a growing demand for modern laboratory equipment. Chester Garfield Fisher was one of the early entrepreneurs to respond to this need, founding the Fisher Scientific Company in 1902. Fisher Scientific went on to become an industry leader in the making of laboratory equipment, and like many manufacturing companies of the time period, it used asbestos in many of its products.
In the first half of the 1900s, asbestos solidified its reputation for making products safer and more durable, and laboratory researchers proved just as enthusiastic about safety as architects and shipbuilders. Bunsen burners were already well established in science laboratories, and asbestos-containing accessories and protective gear quickly became just as ubiquitous.
In 1936, the Labconco Corporation unveiled the first commercially available fume hood. Until this point, chemists throughout history had relied on less sophisticated ways of protecting themselves from chemical fumes and often been poisoned by their research materials as a result. The invention of the fume hood represented a leap forward in laboratory safety, but it suffered an unfortunate step back when transite became a common lining for fume hoods.
Transite had originally been the brand name for a product the Johns Manville Corporation introduced in 1929, but over time the word came to be used generically to refer to any similar asbestos cement product. In addition to Labconco, manufacturers of fume hoods with transite linings included Kewaunee Scientific Corporation, Longo Labs and Hamilton Manufacturing.
As the health hazards of asbestos exposure came to light in the 1970s and 1980s, the use of asbestos was phased out in the manufacture of laboratory equipment. However, older research laboratories still commonly contain asbestos cement products such as countertops and fume hood linings, as well as machinery with internal asbestos insulation.
Many prominent universities have published safety guidelines concerning asbestos materials in laboratories and other places on campus, including:
Asbestos-related diseases are caused by the accumulation of microscopic asbestos fibers in the body, usually in and around the lungs. Because the mineral has no scent or taste, a person can easily inhale asbestos dust without realizing it, and asbestos-related diseases such as asbestosis and mesothelioma typically do not present symptoms until decades after exposure.
The level of exposure risk associated with an asbestos-containing material depends on whether the material is friable or nonfriable. A friable material can be crumbled by hand pressure, producing fine dust and debris. In decades past, asbestos gloves, mats and gauze pads often became friable through age and use, exposing many researchers, science teachers and students to inhalable asbestos dust.
The transite linings that remain in some old laboratory fume hoods are generally not considered friable, but asbestos contaminated dust can still be released if the hood linings are damaged, cut or drilled into. As with all asbestos-containing materials, any work affecting transite fume hood linings should be left to licensed asbestos abatement professionals.
Few lawsuits have been filed specifically because of asbestos-containing laboratory equipment, because asbestos exposure in schools and businesses is usually attributed to the construction materials in the buildings that also contained the toxic mineral. Asbestos exposure from insulation products and construction materials has historically been a much graver concern for students and workers. Nevertheless, anecdotal evidence abounds of science teachers suffering long-term asbestos exposure in chemistry classrooms because of worn-out equipment.
In 2005, a former employee of Fisher Scientific, George Baroni, developed mesothelioma. He had been exposed to asbestos while working for the manufacturer from 1959 to 1994. Baroni did not live to see the trial, but the jury ultimately awarded his family $226,000.
In 2012, a former teacher named James Herbet also filed a lawsuit against Fisher Scientific after he was diagnosed with mesothelioma. Herbet argued he had been exposed to asbestos while using Fisher Scientific’s laboratory equipment in his classrooms from 1979 to 2002. A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, however, because the American school where Herbet had worked was located overseas.
Daniel King joined Asbestos.com in 2017. He comes from a military family and attended high school on a military base. He feels a close connection to veterans, military families and the many hardships they face. As an investigative writer with interests in mesothelioma research and environmental issues, he seeks to educate others about the dangers of asbestos exposure to protect them from the deadly carcinogen linked to asbestos-related conditions.
View our resources for patients and familiesGet Help Today