The Mesothelioma Center at is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource. While the information provides you is well researched, truthful and sourced from mesothelioma specialists, oncologists and reputable medical journals, the information on is not intended as a substitute for professional health care. You should always consult a doctor or another qualified health provider with your questions about your health and well-being.

Do not delay seeking medical advice because of something you have read on creates original content based on the following criteria:

Relevance publishes information about issues that may impact your and your family’s health. Topics covered include the latest mesothelioma treatment news, interviews with mesothelioma experts, news about asbestos exposure, information about managing the disease, personal stories and other content relevant to people coping with mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases.

Clinical Sources relies on the latest findings published in peer-reviewed medical journals such as the Annals of Translational Medicine, PLOS ONE, The Lancet, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, The Oncotarget, Clinical Cancer Research, Nature and other notable medical publications.

Authority interviews well-known mesothelioma specialists and researchers who have published their research in many of the previously mentioned medical journals. identifies these medical experts by name, medical degree, area of medical specialty, and center and location of medical practice. Our team of writers, who are constantly involved in continuing education programs to fine-tune their medical and scientific writing, have spent years reviewing and reading the results of many clinical trials involving new drugs and treatments, speaking with caregivers and survivors, and sharing their personal stories of cancer and mesothelioma.

Best Practices at

Building trust with our users is paramount to, and the following guidelines help us maintain that trust.

These are recommended practices and do not establish standards of conduct for every situation. does not use the words, photos or illustrations of others without permission or attribution. does not fabricate quotes, sources or information and then represent it as fact. does not alter photographs beyond minimal adjustments of color and tone.

Editorial Integrity

All content on is clearly marked as a news story, blog post, feature story or a reference webpage. labels its content as such so users can readily distinguish the difference between news, reference and personal stories. The author and editor of each website page are identified at the bottom of the page.

Journalistic Excellence

When reporting original news, maintains traditional journalistic principles: Direct quotes are not altered except to correct grammar, dialect or slang; all direct quotes and information gathered from another organization are attributed to the original source; the author is clearly identified on the page; sources are listed in pages where they are required; and photographs are not altered except for minimal adjustments to color and tone.

Fact-Checking Process

Our fact-checking process begins with a thorough review of all sources to ensure they are high quality. Then we cross-check the facts with original medical or scientific reports published by those sources, or we validate the facts with reputable news organizations, medical and scientific experts and other health experts. Each page includes all sources for full transparency.

Process for Gathering, Writing and Editing Content

Ideas for original news, blogs, feature stories and reference pages are generated by a writer, the entire writing team, the editor or a marketer. These ideas are discussed and further developed to ensure they are relevant, contain clinical sources if needed and demonstrate authority by including perspectives from medical professionals or findings published in reputable medical journals.

The writer then researches the topic in peer-reviewed medical journals, news stories from reputable mainstream media sources and health-related government databases; interviews researchers, patients, doctors or other health providers; writes the story and submits it to the editor.

The editor, medical editor or both then review the story for accuracy (fact-checking), correct medical language, grammar, AP Style, flow, clarity, relevance and readability.

Medically Reviewed Content on partners with oncologists, licensed mental health counselors, licensed dietitians and other medical health professionals who specialize in the topics we cover and review our content for medical accuracy. We also partner with Physicians’ Review Network Inc., which is a nationally recognized leader in providing independent medical reviews through its network of specialists.

We ask our medical reviewers to consider these guidelines when evaluating the information we provide to the public:

  • Do references to treatment reflect the current standard of care?
  • Is the medical information accurate?
  • Does the material presented need a major rewrite or is it so out of date or inaccurate that it requires replacement?
  • Is the information presented in such a way that a layperson will understand it (not overly complicated or irrelevant for a consumer)?
  • Are the statistics, if any, current?
  • Are the references to resources (other websites) appropriate?
  • Is the grammar correct?
  • Identify typos.

A page reviewed by a medical professional will identify the medical reviewer by name, photo or both at the bottom of the page.

Accountability & Corrections recognizes an ethical responsibility to correct all factual errors, mischaracterizations and ambiguities. If identifies factual errors, it will correct the error. If you find a possible inaccuracy on any page on, let us know by sending an email to Managing Editor Walter Pacheco.

Tell us what you think
Did this article help you?
How did this article help you?
What about this article isn’t helpful for you?
Did this article help you?

Thank you for your feedback. Would you like to speak with a Patient Advocate?