/ Recent News Posts / Asbestos Exposure & Bans

Court Reopens Case Linking Lawn Fertilizer to Mesothelioma

lawn fertilizer

A New Jersey appeals court has reopened a 2012 lawsuit alleging a man developed mesothelioma from using asbestos-contaminated Scotts lawn fertilizer.

The decision comes after the discovery of new evidence the appeals court believes “would probably have changed the result” of the 2014 summary judgment in favor of Scotts.

The original plaintiff, Lorenz Brandecker, filed the lawsuit in July 2012. The Wayne, New Jersey, resident claimed his twice-yearly use of Scotts Turf Builder fertilizer from 1967 to 1980 caused him to develop mesothelioma, a terminal cancer.

According to a report from the National Asbestos Exposure Review (NAER), a project of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the Scotts Company used the mineral vermiculite in its consumer products as a carrier and filler until 2001.

From 1967 to 1980, Scotts used vermiculite from a mine in Libby, Montana, that contained deadly asbestos.

The Scotts facility in Marysville, Ohio, exfoliated approximately 430,000 tons of Libby vermiculite during those years. The site was included in the ATSDR Phase 1 evaluations and was listed as a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) further action site.

Brandecker died in October 2012. His wife took over the suit as the executrix of the estate.

New Evidence Reveals Vintage Fertilizer Samples

In the initial trial, Brandecker’s lawyers asked Scotts to provide samples of its fertilizer products manufactured with vermiculite from Libby.

The lawn care company said it had a Turf Builder vermiculite sample, but it could not determine when it was produced or where the vermiculite came from. In 1980, Scotts switched to using vermiculite ore from South Carolina, Virginia and South Africa.

The trial judge approved a motion to bar all or portions of testimony from Brandecker’s four expert witnesses because the opinions were based on documents from W.R. Grace’s Zonolite vermiculite attic insulation and not Scotts fertilizer.

Scotts filed a separate motion for summary judgment, which was granted on Jan. 10, 2014.

However, a few months later it was revealed Scotts had 26 “vintage” samples of Turf Builder products believed to be manufactured with Libby vermiculite. Some of those samples were presented in a separate 2015 case.

Scotts claims the samples were “categorized and stored” by their attorneys in 2006 and “rediscovered” in Spring of 2014, according to the appeals court report.

In July 2015, the counsel for Brandecker’s estate filed a motion to reopen the case. In the appeal, the plaintiff’s lawyers claimed the 26 samples constituted new evidence and that Scotts made misrepresentations in discovery for the first trial.

A pending decision from the trial court will determine if the plaintiff should be given addition time to file a motion addressing the effect of the discovery violation and summary judgement orders.

Scotts Was a Major Consumer of Libby Vermiculite

According to EPA records, the Scotts facility in Marysville was the single largest U.S. consumer of vermiculite ore from the Libby mines.

Several types of asbestos contaminated the Libby vermiculite mines, including the amphibole asbestos varieties tremolite and actinolite. The NAER report said the mines also contained the asbestiform minerals winchite, richterite and ferro-edenite.

The EPA and the International Agency for Research on Cancer classify all forms of asbestos as carcinogenic. Inhaling or ingesting microscopic asbestos fibers can cause serious health conditions such as asbestosis and mesothelioma.

Most asbestos-related diseases are diagnosed many years — typically decades — after initial asbestos exposure. Brandecker was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 2012, approximately 45 years after he began using the Scotts fertilizer product in question.

Scotts used a process called exfoliation to heat and separate non-vermiculite materials from the vermiculite used in its fertilizer.

The vermiculite was then “trionized” by coating it with a polymer resin called urea.

Scotts contends that even if asbestos fibers remained after exfoliation, the trionization process coated the vermiculite, making it safe.

In July 2017, a state court in Los Angeles ruled in favor of Scotts in a separate lawsuit attempting to link Turf Builder to mesothelioma. That case is on appeal.


Matt Mauney is an award-winning journalist with nearly a decade of professional writing experience. He joined Asbestos.com in 2016, and he spends much of his time reading, analyzing and reporting on mesothelioma research articles to ensure people in the mesothelioma community know the latest medical advancements. Prior to joining Asbestos.com, Matt was a reporter at the Orlando Sentinel. Matt also edits some of the pages on the website. He also holds a certificate in health writing from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Read More

Sources
  1. Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division. (2018, February 26). DOCKET NO. A-5733-14T4.
    Retrieved from: http://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/assets/opinions/appellate/unpublished/a5733-14.pdf
  2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2005, September 22). Health Consultation: THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC (FORMERLY O.M. SCOTT AND SONS COMPANY).
    Retrieved from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/asbestos/sites/health_consultations/pdf/OMScottfinal.pdf
  3. Toutant, C. (2018, February 27). Court Grants New Chance for Suit Linking Lawn Fertilizer, Mesothelioma.
    Retrieved from: https://www.law.com/njlawjournal/2018/02/26/court-grants-new-chance-for-suit-linking-lawn-fertilizer-mesothelioma/
  4. DocketAlarm.com. (2016, April 21). Fraser et al. v. The Scotts Company LLC. Retrieved from: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/California_State_Court_of_Appeals_Second_District/B271747/Fraser_et_al._v._The_Scotts_Company_LLC/

More on This Topic

View our resources for patients and families

Get Help Today
Get Your Free Mesothelioma Guide Chat live with a patient advocate now loading spinner