United States Bankruptcy Judge Christopher M. López of the Southern District of Texas has denied Johnson & Johnson’s $10 billion baby powder settlement proposal. This is the third time J&J’s bankruptcy strategy has failed in court.
If approved, J&J’s plan would have ended more than 60,000 ovarian cancer lawsuits. The company estimates each plaintiff with ovarian cancer linked to an asbestos-related disease would have received between $75,000 and $150,000 through the plan.
The deal would also have ended any similar lawsuits in the future but would not have affected any remaining mesothelioma lawsuits. J&J claims to have settled 95% of the mesothelioma lawsuits that have been filed.
Plaintiffs with mesothelioma cancer have pursued their legal claims through the traditional court systems to seek compensation. With the failure of J&J’s settlement proposal, plaintiffs with ovarian cancer will also continue to pursue their cases in court.
Why Did Judge López Rule Against J&J?
According to Judge López’s ruling, the settlement was rejected for several reasons. These include unfair legal protections, voting issues and concerns about justice for all claimants. The ruling states: “this case distilled to fundamental bankruptcy principles.”
Claimant votes were determined to be unreliable because some law firms cast tens of thousands of votes without getting permission from their clients. Also, many claimants didn’t have enough time or information to vote properly. Some votes were switched at the last minute, violating the voting rules.
In his ruling, Judge López also noted the settlement plan attempted to shield J&J, retailers and others from future talc lawsuits — even from individuals who didn’t consent. In this context, this type of forced legal protection, known as nonconsensual third-party releases, isn’t permitted under bankruptcy law.
Court findings state regarding J&J’s subsidiary, Red River Talc LLC, “There is no real company or jobs to save here.” Jude López’s ruling notes, “In the end, based on the Court’s on-the-spot evaluation, the prepetition voting and solicitation issues, the denial of plan confirmation, and the unique nature of this divisional merger case, there is cause to dismiss this case. There is not any one individual factor that requires this result. It is all of them together that require the Court to dismiss this case.”
The ruling also indicates a consideration was the amount allocated to current claimants. which might not leave enough for all future claimants. Instead of appealing, J&J says it plans to fight the lawsuits individually in court.
What Does J&J Plan to Do Now?
J&J says it plans to fight the outstanding ovarian cancer talc lawsuits in court. In a corporate press release, the company announced, “Rather than pursue a protracted appeal, the Company will return to the tort system to litigate and defeat” the remaining cases.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for J&J, was quoted in the press release as well. He declared, “We prevailed in 16 of 17 ovarian cases tried in the last 11 years and will devote our efforts to defeating these fake claims.”
Haas further claimed, “The Company reiterates that none of the talc-related claims against it have merit and attempts to resolve this litigation were aimed at moving past this issue. The decision to litigate every filed case is based on the simple fact that this is a fake claim created by greedy plaintiff lawyers looking for another deep pocket to sue and fueled by litigation-financed attorney advertising.”
According to new research released in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, applying talcum powder to the genitals can cause ovarian cancer. The study also…
On behalf of the company, Haas argues people’s claims that asbestos-contaminated talc in J&J’s products caused their cancer are “false, based on bad science.” The company continues to maintain its products are asbestos-free and safe.
J&J has spent approximately $1 billion on legal defenses of talc claims. Court documents reveal J&J knew its talc contained asbestos as early as the 1950s. Lab tests show asbestos in J&J talc from 1971 to the early 2000s, but the company never reported those findings to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
In 2020, J&J stopped making talc-based baby powder and switched to cornstarch-based ingredients after public concerns over safety increased. Talc forms near asbestos deposits, making it challenging to keep these minerals apart.
Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral that is resistant to corrosion and heat. It’s the primary cause of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.
The information on this website is proprietary and protected. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Any unauthorized or illegal use, copying or dissemination will be prosecuted. Please read our privacy policy and terms of service for more information about our website.
This website and its content may be deemed attorney advertising. Prior results do not predict a similar outcome.
The Mesothelioma Center’s claim as the most trusted resource is based on our more than 150 5-star Google and BBB reviews. Our organization also helps more than half of all mesothelioma patients annually diagnosed.
Your web browser is no longer supported by Microsoft. Update your browser for more security, speed and compatibility.
If you are looking for mesothelioma support, please contact our Patient Advocates at (855) 404-4592
Fact Checked
Our fact-checking process begins with a thorough review of all sources to ensure they are high quality. Then we cross-check the facts with original medical or scientific reports published by those sources, or we validate the facts with reputable news organizations, medical and scientific experts and other health experts. Each page includes all sources for full transparency.
Reviewed
Asbestos.com is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource
The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com has provided patients and their loved ones the most updated and reliable information on mesothelioma and asbestos exposure since 2006.
Our team of Patient Advocates includes a medical doctor, a registered nurse, health services administrators, veterans, VA-accredited Claims Agents, an oncology patient navigator and hospice care expert. Their combined expertise means we help any mesothelioma patient or loved one through every step of their cancer journey.
More than 30 contributors, including mesothelioma doctors, survivors, health care professionals and other experts, have peer-reviewed our website and written unique research-driven articles to ensure you get the highest-quality medical and health information.
About The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com
Assisting mesothelioma patients and their loved ones since 2006.
Helps more than 50% of mesothelioma patients diagnosed annually in the U.S.
A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
5-star reviewed mesothelioma and support organization.
My family has only the highest compliment for the assistance and support that we received from The Mesothelioma Center. This is a staff of compassionate and knowledgeable individuals who respect what your family is experiencing and who go the extra mile to make an unfortunate diagnosis less stressful. Information and assistance were provided by The Mesothelioma Center at no cost to our family.
Travis Rodgers is an Emmy-nominated journalist with more than two decades of experience in television news. He held many roles in broadcasting, but spent most of his time as a producer crafting live newscasts for multiple network affiliates. Travis now brings his many years of writing experience to Asbestos.com.
Fact-checked and verified content:
Our fact-checking process begins with a thorough review of all sources to ensure they are high quality. Then we cross-check the facts with original medical or scientific reports published by those sources, or we validate the facts with reputable news organizations, medical and scientific experts and other health experts. Each page includes all sources for full transparency.
Please read our editorial guidelines to learn more about our content creation and review process.
