Burnham Holdings’ History with Asbestos
In addition to boilers and boiler insulation, Burnham Commercial manufactured and produced a number of asbestos-containing products, including fire-retardant bricks, gaskets and pipe insulation.
Adding asbestos fibers to the components made them more durable and resistant to heat and fire. Unfortunately, it also made them dangerous. Anyone who worked with Burnham Commercial’s boilers until the 1980s could be at risk of developing an asbestos-related disease such as mesothelioma.
Until the late 1980s, boilers contained a number of asbestos-containing products, including insulation around the boiler’s walls, tube banks and internal pipes, gaskets, bearings to paste lagging or even raw asbestos.
These materials remain in many commercial, residential and industrial buildings as well as ships built before 1975. Disturbing asbestos-containing parts on these boilers can lead to asbestos exposure.
Asbestos-related personal injury claims have been filed by individuals that were exposed to asbestos from Burnham Holdings products, more specifically, products from its Burnham Commercial facilities.
Unlike many companies that manufactured asbestos-containing products, Burnham has not created a bankruptcy trust for asbestos claims. Instead, the company has decided to continue to defend itself in court.
Exposed to Asbestos at Burnham Holdings?
Gain access to trust funds, grants and other forms of compensation for you or your loved ones.Get Help Now
Asbestos Litigation Involving Burnham Holdings
Burnham has been asked to pay millions of dollars in asbestos claims. Because of the long latency period of asbestos-related conditions, between 20 to 50 years, the company expects more lawsuits in the future.
According to Burnham Holdings’ 2018 financial report, charges for uninsured litigation were $1.25 million and expenses for legal counsel, consultants and other costs to defend claims (including asbestos claims) was $187,000.
In the 2018 annual report, the company said it believes the vast majority of future asbestos claims should be resolved within existing insurance limits and reserves — whether it be through trial verdicts or out-of-court settlements.
However, Burnham Holdings officials did note that asbestos litigation involves many uncertainties and the company cannot predict the extent to which new claims will be filed or the financial impact it may have on the business.
Case of Five Plaintiffs Exposed to Asbestos
In July 2013, a New York jury awarded $190 million in an asbestos-related lawsuit involving Burnham Commercial. Five plaintiffs were exposed to asbestos while working in the plumbing, steamfitting and construction industries and developed mesothelioma as a result of their exposure.
One plaintiff handled and demolished boilers with asbestos-containing components throughout his career. Another plaintiff, a steamfitter, handled boilers containing asbestos.
A third plaintiff, a pipefitter, worked at New York’s Brooklyn Navy Yard from 1951 and 1966 and was exposed while handling pipes of distillers that processed saltwater. The other two plaintiffs were plumbers who handled boilers and pipes covered in asbestos.
Burnham Commercial’s monetary obligations for the five lawsuits totaled $42.2 million, or 21.2% of the total damages awarded. However, the company filed post-trial motions and appeals seeking to reduce or overturn the verdicts.
On February 9, 2015, New York Supreme Court Judge Joan Madden ruled that all five damage awards “deviate from reasonable compensation,” and significantly reduced Burnham Commercial’s liability to less than $7 million.
Case of Steamfitter Charles Hillyer
In 2014, a separate lawsuit returned a $6 million verdict against the company, but that too was later reduced by an appeals court to less than $2 million. The plaintiff in that case, Charles Hillyer, allegedly developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working as a steamfitter from 1960 to 1983.
Hillyer testified he had been exposed to asbestos insulation on boilers, including those made by Burnham Commercial. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 2013 and died in September 2014. Hillyer’s family took over the lawsuit after his death.
In Hillyer’s case, New York judge Cynthia Kern ruled the $20 million award for past pain and suffering against Burnham and several other boiler manufacturers “deviates materially from what would be reasonable.” The total award was reduced to $6 million, with Burnham’s liability reduced to $2 million.
Burnham Holdings’ Asbestos Products and Workers at Risk
The following asbestos-containing products were manufactured by Burnham:
- Boiler insulation
- Pipe insulation
- Fire-retardant bricks
Burnham’s boilers contained asbestos through the 1980s. Anyone who manufactured these products or worked around Burnham boilers in their career was at risk of asbestos exposure.
The following occupations were at risk of working around Burnham’s asbestos-containing products:
- Boiler workers
- Boiler technicians
- Boiler repairmen
- HVAC installers
- HVAC mechanics
- Brick masons
- Power plant workers
- Industrial workers
- Maintenance workers
- Shipyard workers
- Veterans of the armed forces
Burnham Holdings History
Burnham Commercial traces its origins to the mid-1880s when Frederick A. Lord founded a New York-based greenhouse manufacturer, then named Lord’s Horticultural Manufacturing Company. In 1872, Lord’s son-in-law, William Burnham, joined the company to help make greenhouses for large estates in upstate New York.
Shortly after, the greenhouse industry was in need of a solution to provide adjustable and evenly distributed heat to large areas, which motivated the company to make its first cast iron boiler. Lord’s Horticultural Manufacturing Company later became known as the Lord & Burnham Company.
In 1905, it merged with the Pierson-Sefton Company and the Hitchings Company, which specialized in manufacturing heating systems and ventilating systems for greenhouses, to form the Burnham-Pierson-Sefton Corporation.
Following growth and acquisitions, the Burnham Boiler Company was established in 1919 and took over the boiler business from Lord & Burnham Company and its affiliated companies. The company was renamed Burnham Corporation and is currently referred to as Burnham Commercial, and it is owned by Burnham Holdings.
Today, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Burnham Commercial continues to produce steam and hot water boilers for commercial and industrial applications, although asbestos is no longer added to components. The company’s products are sold in the U.S., Canada and Mexico and are used throughout schools, government buildings, places of worship and historical sites.
7 Cited Article Sources
Burnham Holdings, Inc. (2019, February 14). Burnham Holdings, Inc. Announces Year 2018 Financial Results.
Retrieved from: https://www.burnhamholdings.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Press-Release_BHI-Announces-Year-2018-Financial-Results_02-14-2019.pdf
Burnham Commercial. (2019). About Burnham Commercial.
Retrieved from: http://www.burnhamcommercial.com/about-us.php
Sundar, S. (2015, May 19). Boiler Maker Could See $20M Asbestos Verdict Cut To $6M.
Retrieved from: https://www.law360.com/articles/657936/boiler-maker-could-see-20m-asbestos-verdict-cut-to-6m
Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. (2016, August 9). Asbestos Toxicity Where Is Asbestos Found?
Retrieved from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/csem.asp?csem=29&po=5
Sistrunk, J. (2013, July 24). NY Jury Awards $190M Over Asbestos Injuries, Deaths.
Retrieved from: http://www.law360.com/articles/459738/ny-jury-awards-190m-over-asbestos-injuries-deaths
Burnham Holdings. (n.d.). About Us.
Retrieved from: http://www.burnhamholdings.com/company-profile.php
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). U.S. Federal Bans on Asbestos. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/asbestos/us-federal-bans-asbestos
How did this article help you?
What about this article isn’t helpful for you?
Did this article help you?
Share this article
Last Modified September 24, 2019