Dana Corporation logo

Dana Corporation

  • Year Founded: 1904
Get Financial Assistance
Jump to a Topic:


Dana Corporation, currently operating as Dana Holding Corporation, was established in 1904 by a 29-year-old engineering student. After inventing a breakthrough car part, the Spicer Universal Joint, Clarence Spicer left Cornell University to found an automotive parts business in Plainfield, New Jersey.

Dana Corporation Facts:
  • Founded: 1904
  • Years Operated: 1904 - Present
  • Headquarters: Maumee, Ohio
  • Business: Manufactures automotive parts
  • Asbestos Trust: No
  • Bankruptcy Status: Filed March 2006 and reorganized in December 2007

Spicer originally incorporated his company as the Spicer Universal Joint Manufacturing Company in 1905, but changed the name to Spicer Manufacturing Company four years later. Spicer provided a wide range of automotive parts to companies like Buick, Wayne, Mack, Olds, Stevens-Duryea and American Motor Car Company. Some of these parts contained toxic asbestos materials, which made the company vulnerable to a slew of asbestos personal injury claims in decades to follow.

By 1914, the Spicer Company struggled with financial difficulties. Attorney and financier Charles Dana invested in the company shortly after, assuming the role of president in 1916.

The Spicer Company relocated to Toledo, Ohio in 1928 and became the Dana Corporation in 1946. Two years later Charles Dana was named chairman of the board, and a series of acquisitions brought his company decades of success following World War II. Dana Corporation continued to expand its product line, purchasing automotive part suppliers such as the Perfect Circle Corporation in 1963 and the Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company in 1966.

By 2006 Dana Corporation once again faced financial problems, and the company filed for bankruptcy protection that year. Dana Corporation asserted that its asbestos liabilities, which totaled only 3 percent of its total debt in 2006, were not responsible for the bankruptcy. The previous year, however, the company defended a total of 88,000 pending asbestos claims. Dana began reorganization in December 2007.

Now known as Dana Incorporated, the company has been on the Fortune 500 list for 24 years, generating sales of nearly $7.2 billion in 2017 alone.

Asbestos Litigation Against Dana Corporation

On Dec. 30, 2016, the company established Dana Companies LLC, a consolidated, wholly-owned company created as part of the 2008 bankruptcy reorganization to hold and manage personal injury asbestos claims. After completion of that sale, Dana Incorporated has no obligation with respect to current or future asbestos claims.

According to Dana’s 2017 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the company had approximately 25,000 active pending asbestos personal injury claims as of Dec. 31, 2015.

Specific Lawsuits

The biggest litigation against Dana Corporation to date came in 2017 in the case of Marlena Robaey, who was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in November 2012.

Dana and four other manufacturers of asbestos automotive components were found liable for Robaey’s injuries.

Robaey assisted her husband with repairing asbestos-containing car parts for more than 20 years. In the 2017 case, a New York jury ruled that Dana was 40 percent liable for her injuries.

The overall award of $75 million to Robaey and her husband stands as the largest single mesothelioma verdict in the state’s history.

In 2008, a group called the Ad Hoc Committee of Asbestos Claimants appealed Dana Corporation’s recently accepted reorganization plan to emerge from bankruptcy. The committee believed the company hadn’t set aside enough money to settle current and future asbestos claims.

Dana Corporation responded to the committee’s concerns, noting that it set aside $240 million in cash and other assets to cover future asbestos liabilities. The company based this figure on the number of active cases pending and the number of dismissed cases.

Couple reviewing financial assistance options

Exposed to Asbestos at Dana Corporation?

Gain access to trust funds, grants and other forms of compensation for you or your loved ones.

Get Help Now

In one notable asbestos lawsuit, a former pipefitter sought recovery for his asbestos-related injuries in 2002. Louis Hicks filed the lawsuit against the Dana Corporation and 10 other asbestos companies after developing mesothelioma, a cancer that was caused by exposure to asbestos products he worked with over more than four decades.

Although Hicks passed away from his disease in 2003, his daughter continued the suit. The court found all 11 manufacturers responsible for Hicks’s illness, ordering them to pay his estate $5,000,000. Because ample evidence proved that Hicks was exposed to Dana Corporation asbestos gaskets, the company was ordered to pay Hicks’s estate $464,605.65.

Dana Holding Corp. had about 31,000 active pending asbestos claims as of June 30, 2010. Approximately 11,000 inactive claims were settled and waiting for final documentation before dismissal. In 2010, the company estimated that its asbestos liabilities would extend through the next 15 years.

Industries and Occupations

For decades, the Dana Corporation provided an array of asbestos-containing products to standard and heavy-duty vehicle manufacturers. Thousands of individuals, ranging from automotive production workers to mechanics, have developed asbestos-related illnesses after exposure to these contaminated parts.

A common pathway for asbestos exposure is brake work, as replacing deteriorating asbestos brake pads can stir up dangerous levels of airborne fibers. Such conditions put any unprotected shop worker in the vicinity at risk for lung cancer, mesothelioma and other diseases. Dana Corporation also manufactured asbestos-containing gaskets, which may have affected the health of boiler workers, engine room workers and steam fitters.


Dana Corporation products manufactured with asbestos ingredients include brake pads, brake linings, thermal management products, gaskets and seals. Asbestos could also be found in products that transmit power, such as universal joints, drive shafts, transmissions and axles.

In 2007, the company settled 7,500 claims involving asbestos gaskets. Dana announced it would pay a maximum of $2 million to settle all claims.

Dana Establishes VEBA Trust Fund

While the Dana Corporation has not established a trust fund to compensate all individuals harmed by its asbestos products, the company did create a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trust fund for former employees of the company.

Replacing welfare and long-term disability benefits, the VEBA trust covers asbestos-related medical expenses for participants and their families. To fund the trust, Dana Corporation contributed approximately $700 million cash and $80 million in company stock.

Free Help Finding a Specialist

Get Help Now
Asbestos.com Mesothelioma Packet

Learn About Treatment

Get a Free Guide

Qualify for Free Medical Care

See If You Qualify

Senior Editor

Matt Mauney is an award-winning journalist with more than a decade of professional writing and editing experience. He joined The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com in 2016, and he spends much of his time reading, analyzing and reporting on mesothelioma research articles to ensure people in the mesothelioma community know the latest medical advances. Prior to joining Asbestos.com, Matt was a Community Manager at the Orlando Sentinel. Matt also edits pages, articles and other content on the website. He holds a certificate in health writing from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Walter Pacheco, Managing Editor at Asbestos.com
Edited by

10 Cited Article Sources

The sources on all content featured in The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com include medical and scientific studies, peer-reviewed studies and other research documents from reputable organizations.

  1. United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2017, February 10). Form 10-K Dana Incorporated. Retrieved from: https://danaincorporated.gcs-web.com/static-files/ec543836-2aeb-4709-8afe-284f4837868f
  2. Fortune.com. (2018). Fortune 500 – Dana. Retrieved from: http://fortune.com/fortune500/dana/
  3. Weitz & Luxenberg. (2017, January 31). W&L Wins $75 Million in Largest Single Asbestos Verdict Ever in New York. Retrieved from: https://www.weitzlux.com/firm-news/wl-wins-75-million-largest-single-asbestos-verdict-ever-new-york/
  4. Asbestos Bankruptcy Funds & Trusts. (n.d.). Retrieved July 9, 2012, from Retrieved from: http://www.militaryconnection.com/articles%5Casbestos%5Casbestos-bankruptcy-funds-trusts.asp
  5. Dana Corp. Asbestos Claimants Appeal Chapter 11 Plan Confirmation. (2008, January 6). Retrieved from: http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2008/01/06/Dana-Corp-asbestos-claimants-appeal-Chapter-11-plan-confirmation.html
  6. Dana History. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2017, from Retrieved from: http://www.dana.com/corporate-pages/history
  7. Dana Holding has 31,000 Asbestos Cases as of June 2010. (2010, August1). : Retrieved from: http://researchwell.com/2010/08/
  8. Pakulski, Gary. (2007, December 9). Dana in Home Stretch of Bankruptcy. Retrieved from: http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2007/12/09/Dana-in-home-stretch-of-bankruptcy.html
  9. Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC. (2002). Retrieved from: http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20PACO%2020091119817.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR
  10. Dana Corporation Announces Settlements with USW and UAW, Agreement with Centerbridge Capital Partners on Major Investment in Dana. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dana-corporation-announces-settlements-with-usw-and-uaw-agreement-with-centerbridge-capital-partners-on-major-investment-in-dana-52707147.html

Did this article help you?

Did this article help you?

Thank you for your feedback. Would you like to speak with a Patient Advocate?

Share this article

Last Modified January 31, 2019

Get Your Free Mesothelioma Guide Chat live with a patient advocate now