Rapid-American Corp./Philip Carey Manufacturing Corp. logo

Rapid-American Corp./Philip Carey Manufacturing Corp.

  • Year Founded: 1888

Rapid-American Corporation filed for bankruptcy in 2013 after facing approximately 275,000 asbestos-related claims. The legal trouble spawned from its merger in the 1970s with Philip Carey Manufacturing Corporation, which produced asbestos insulation products.

Get Financial Assistance

History of Rapid-American Corp. with Asbestos

Philip Carey Manufacturing Corporation was a longtime manufacturer of insulation products for industrial equipment, including boilers, pipes, generators and more.

For nearly 80 years, the company mined asbestos and manufactured asbestos-containing products for various industries. Sometimes referred to as “Old Carey,” the company was established in Ohio in 1888.

In October 1972, a merger between Philip Carey and another Ohio-based company called Rapid-American Corporation occurred.

Because Philip Carey Manufacturing used asbestos to make products, many workers were dangerously exposed to these toxic fibers. The company, along with its subsidiaries and spinoffs, eventually became the target of substantial legal claims after these products harmed employees and consumers.

Rapid-American Corp./Philip Carey Manufacturing Corp. Facts:
  • Founded: 1888
  • Years Operated: 1888-present
  • Headquarters: New York, New York
  • Business: Manufactured insulation and industrial applications
  • Asbestos Trust: No
  • Bankruptcy Status: Filed in 2013

Notable Asbestos Lawsuits Against Rapid-American

Rapid-American started facing asbestos-related lawsuits in 1974 after it acquired Philip Carey. The thousands of legal claims against Rapid-American and its subsidiaries took a financial toll on the company.

The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2013 because it was facing an estimated 275,000 asbestos claims. Rapid-American only settled about 75,000 of the claims and listed between $100 million and $500 million in dept, according to court filings.

In July 2017, Rapid-American and two other groups requested a protective order from double-dipping in the asbestos recovery system. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Stuart Bernstein denied the order on Feb. 12, 2018, refusing to strike the subpoenas issued by insurers that process asbestos personal injury claims.

Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.

Henry Pustejovsky was exposed to asbestos from 1954 through 1979 as a metal worker.

In 1982, he was diagnosed with asbestosis, a nonmalignant disease caused by inhaling asbestos fibers. Pustejovsky filed a lawsuit against Johns-Manville Corporation, one of the asbestos product suppliers to his employer, and received a $25,000 settlement.

In 1994, Pustejovsky was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a terminal cancer caused by asbestos exposure. He then sued Rapid-American and other asbestos suppliers for his injuries.

Defendants argued that Pustejovsky was out of the statutes of limitations for a second claim because he first discovered his injuries from occupational asbestos exposure 12 years earlier with the asbestosis diagnosis.

Pustejovsky showed undisputed medical evidence that asbestosis and mesothelioma are separate injuries. However, the trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants based on statute of limitations and an appeals court held up the decision.

In 2010, the Texas Supreme Court reversed the decision. It ruled that a person who previously received compensation for an asbestos-related disease should have the opportunity to pursue a second lawsuit if they are later diagnosed with mesothelioma.

Novicki v. Rapid-American

In March 1997, the family of Julius L. Novicki filed a lawsuit against Rapid-American, along with 44 additional defendants, for wrongful death relating to the “sale, installation and repair of asbestos products.”

Novicki spent seven years as a welder where he used asbestos-containing products manufactured by Rapid-American and other companies. He later developed mesothelioma and died in 1995.

The case, Novicki v. Rapid-American, further exposed the occupational dangers associated with exposure to Philip Carey asbestos products.

Rapid-American Bankruptcy and Legal Proceedings

After Rapid-American filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2013, the company has faced an ongoing legal saga with insurers responsible for covering liabilities.

Several insurers that issued policies to Rapid became insolvent and unable to pay the full amounts of those policies. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. policy was the highest at $3 million of primary coverage and $60 million of excess coverage.

In June 2016, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein ruled that the majority of excess insurers owed nothing to Rapid-American for asbestos claims until the company exhausted the $700 million it promised to pay.

Bernstein’s ruling in February 2018 cleared the insurers to subpoena Rapid-American over asbestos claim information. Those subpoenas were issued in May 2019 in a New York bankruptcy court.

Learn How to Hire a Qualified Mesothelioma Lawyer

Couple reviewing financial assistance options

Exposed to Asbestos at Rapid-American/Philip Carey Manufacturing Corp.?

Gain access to trust funds, grants and other forms of compensation for you or your loved ones.

Get Help Now

Philip Carey Asbestos Products

Philip Carey used asbestos to manufacture a variety of industrial equipment, including boilers, pipes, insulation and generators. Carey Canada, a subsidiary of Celotex, even owned and operated an asbestos mine in Quebec.

Examples of the asbestos products manufactured by the original Philip Carey Manufacturing Corporation include:

  • Carey-Canadian Asbestos 7RF Floats

  • Carey Thermo-Board concrete

  • Carey Rock Wool

  • Asbestos Magnesia Diatomite Rock Wool

  • Carey Stone

  • Fire-Chex Singles

Workers and Occupations at Risk

Anyone who worked with equipment or asbestos products manufactured by Philip Carey before the 1970s is at high risk of developing an asbestos-related disease. Mesothelioma and related diseases typically take decades to develop after a person is exposed to asbestos.

Industrial engineers, metal and factory workers, machinists and other industrial occupations were among the most at risk for exposure to these products.

Receiving regular screenings from your doctor is recommended to anyone who believes they were at increased risk of asbestos exposure.


Free Help Finding a Specialist

Get Help Now
Asbestos.com Mesothelioma Packet

Learn About Treatment

Get a Free Guide

Qualify for Free Medical Care

See If You Qualify

Writer

Daniel King joined Asbestos.com in 2017. He comes from a military family and attended high school on an Air Force base in Japan, so he feels a close connection to veterans, military families and the many hardships they face. As an investigative writer with interests in mesothelioma research and environmental issues, he seeks to educate others about the dangers of asbestos exposure to protect them from the deadly carcinogen. Daniel holds several certificates in health writing from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and he is a member of the National Association of Science Writers.

Walter Pacheco, Managing Editor at Asbestos.com
Edited by
Reviewed by placeholder
Scientific Review By

7 Cited Article Sources

  1. Archer, R. (2019, May 14). Insurer Faces Pushback In Bid For Asbestos Victims' Info.
    Retrieved from: https://www.law360.com/articles/1159623/insurer-faces-pushback-in-bid-for-asbestos-victims-info
  2. Hiltzik, M. (2019, January 29). R.I.P. Meshulam Riklis, the last of the original corporate raiders.
    Retrieved from: https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-riklis-20190129-story.html
  3. O’Brien. (2018, February 27). With judge's approval, insurers are looking for double-dipping in case they're forced to pay for asbestos claims.
    Retrieved from: https://legalnewsline.com/stories/511352511-with-judge-s-approval-insurers-are-looking-for-double-dipping-in-case-they-re-forced-to-pay-for-asbestos-claims
  4. Trader, S. (2016, June 7). Excess Insurers Off Hook In Asbestos Row, Ch. 11 Judge Says.
    Retrieved from: https://www.law360.com/articles/804465
  5. Chutchian, M. (2013, March 8). Rapid-American Enters Ch. 11 To Handle Asbestos Claims.
    Retrieved from: https://www.law360.com/articles/422162/rapid-american-enters-ch-11-to-handle-asbestos-claims
  6. Texas Supreme Court. (2000, November 30). Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp., 35 S.W.3d 643 (Tex. 2000).
    Retrieved from: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1575887/pustejovsky-v-rapid-american-corp/
  7. Indiana Court of Appeals. (1999, March 17). Novicki v. Rapid-American Corp., 707 N.E.2d 322 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). Retrieved from: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2156579/novicki-v-rapid-american-corp/
  •  
  •  
  •  

Did this article help you?

Did this article help you?

Thank you for your feedback. Would you like to speak with a Patient Advocate?

On This Page

Back to Top

Share this article

Last Modified October 30, 2019

Get Your Free Mesothelioma Guide Chat live with a patient advocate now