Scientifically Reviewed By:
Written By:
Last Modified January 12, 2022
This page features 17 Cited Research Articles
Fact Checked
Our fact-checking process begins with a thorough review of all sources to ensure they are high quality. Then we cross-check the facts with original medical or scientific reports published by those sources, or we validate the facts with reputable news organizations, medical and scientific experts and other health experts. Each page includes all sources for full transparency.
Reviewed

Asbestos.com is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource

The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com has provided patients and their loved ones the most updated and reliable information on mesothelioma and asbestos exposure since 2006.

Our team of Patient Advocates includes a medical doctor, a registered nurse, health services administrators, veterans, VA-accredited Claims Agents, an oncology patient navigator and hospice care expert. Their combined expertise means we help any mesothelioma patient or loved one through every step of their cancer journey.

More than 30 contributors, including mesothelioma doctors, survivors, health care professionals and other experts, have peer-reviewed our website and written unique research-driven articles to ensure you get the highest-quality medical and health information.

About The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com

  • Assisting mesothelioma patients and their loved ones since 2006.
  • Helps more than 50% of mesothelioma patients diagnosed annually in the U.S.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed mesothelioma and support organization.
Learn More About Us

Testimonials

"My family has only the highest compliment for the assistance and support that we received from The Mesothelioma Center. This is a staff of compassionate and knowledgeable individuals who respect what your family is experiencing and who go the extra mile to make an unfortunate diagnosis less stressful. Information and assistance were provided by The Mesothelioma Center at no cost to our family."
Lashawn
Mesothelioma patient’s daughter
  • Google Review Rating
  • BBB Review Rating
Read Our Testimonials
Quick Facts About Asbestos in North Dakota
  • Ranking in Deaths:
    39th
  • Mesothelioma Deaths:
    135
  • Asbestosis Deaths:
    22
  • Total Deaths:
    157

About North Dakota

North Dakota maintains a low death rate from asbestos-related diseases compared to other states. A large part of that low ranking can be attributed to the fact that the state is the third least-populated state in the nation, with much of its economy based on agriculture.

States with the highest rates of asbestos-related disease typically have economies driven by mining, manufacturing or other industrial sectors. However, North Dakota residents still face an increased risk of asbestos exposure even if the threat is not clearly apparent.

Much of the asbestos exposure risk in the state comes from natural disasters, product imports from Montana and relatively unknown environmental dangers, in addition to hazardous job sites where the majority of exposures occur. Statistically, the threat of asbestos may be as close to residents as within the four walls of their North Dakota homes. Because of its widespread use in previous decades, asbestos can still be found in homes and buildings across the state in the form of construction materials and consumer products.

Asbestos lawsuits are not common in North Dakota despite known instances of asbestos exposure. The state’s asbestos litigation laws present challenges to asbestos plaintiffs compared to some other states. For example, in 2021, North Dakota legislators passed a bill requiring asbestos plaintiffs to submit evidence supporting the inclusion of each defendant when filing an asbestos claim, a step that typically happens after the claim is filed.

Because asbestos-related diseases begin to develop decades after exposure, the long-term effects of previous exposure do not become apparent for years to come. Continued observation of asbestos risk factors is required to ensure that the proper treatment resources and environmental policies are place to meet the needs of the public.

Occupations and Environmental Areas at Risk

Harmful asbestos exposures in the state primarily stem from construction and industrial jobs.

Occupations with asbestos exposure hazards:

  • Insulators
  • Construction workers
  • Industrial plant workers
  • Power generation workers
  • Agricultural workers and farmers
  • Oil refinery workers
Mesothelioma Packet
Free Mesothelioma Guide
Receive a 200-page mesothelioma guide overnight. Learn about treatment options and support resources.

Treatment Centers near North Dakota

640 Jackson St, St Paul, MN 55101Doctors in Hospital: 1
200 1st St SW Rochester, MN 55905Doctors in Hospital: 6
1665 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO 80045Doctors in Hospital: 2
310 Sunnyview Ln, Kalispell, MT 59901Doctors in Hospital: 2
9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226Doctors in Hospital: 3
2160 S. 1st Ave., Maywood, IL 60153Doctors in Hospital: 5
By submitting, you agree to our privacy policy and disclaimer. Our Patient Advocates may contact you via phone, email and/or text.

Job Sites with Known Asbestos Exposure

Most asbestos exposure cases stem from occupational exposure, which refers to an employee’s interaction with asbestos in the workplace. Despite North Dakota’s relatively low number of mesothelioma cases, some places within the state still face a serious threat. Certain job sites have had confirmed cases of asbestos exposure where the full extent of harm is still not yet known.

Robinson Insulation Plant

Located in Minot, North Dakota, the former Robinson Insulation Plant was a job site where employees were exposed to hazardous levels of asbestos. From 1967 and 1983, the plant housed over 16,000 tons of asbestos-containing vermiculite. The surrounding areas of the plant consisted of industrial, residential and commercial sites.

According to the Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry, environmental samples from the Robinson Insulation Plant showed that some of the asbestos came from a mine in Libby, Montana. The site was eventually purchased by the city and the buildings were demolished. All former employees of the plant are recommended to undergo medical testing to identify any potential health issues on an annual basis.

Vermiculite-tainted asbestos that was mined in Libby, Montana, was shipped to three other cities in North Dakota. The vast majority of it was sent to Stanton and Minot.

Minot and Widespread Flooding

In the summer of 2011, the First District Health Unit, along with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, warned homeowners in the city of Minot and surrounding areas that asbestos exposure was a serious threat. Homes that were destroyed from recent floods possibly contained asbestos.

By some accounts, the floods of 2011 were the worst floods in the state’s history. More than 11,000 residents were evacuated and more than 4,000 homes were damaged. The underlying environmental threat existed within the materials in the homes. Some homes likely contained asbestos in either the foundation of the structure or in various products throughout the home.

Zonolite insulation, a branded form of vermiculite-containing asbestos material, was of major concern for local health organizations. This attic insulation was likely used in thousands of homes in the state during previous decades, where it likely remains today.

Erionite in North Dakota

One hidden threat to North Dakotans is a toxic substance that is widespread but unknown to many. Erionite is a naturally occurring mineral that closely resembles the chemical structure of asbestos. It is located in at least a dozen states in the nation. Early data show that erionite may be as much 800 times more likely to cause mesothelioma than asbestos, which poses a potential threat.

In North Dakota, erionite is frequently used as gravel for roadways. Residents who drive on these roads release fibers into the air on a regular basis. Once airborne, the fibers can become lodged into the lungs of unknowing motorists, students and commuters.

A 2011 study reported more than 300 miles of roads were surfaced with erionite-containing gravel in Dunn County, North Dakota. It also reported that high levels of airborne erionite were recorded at school bus stops and inside vehicles, including schools buses, even with the windows closed.

A 2013 study published in Environmental Geochemistry and Health reported that the EPA conducted erionite exposure studies in Dunn County in 2006 and 2008. The EPA reported that roads, ball fields and parking lots surfaced with erionite-containing gravel generated high levels of airborne erionite when disturbed by normal activities such as driving, raking and bicycling.

The North Dakota Department of Health developed an erionite program, which informs residents of deposit locations and offers safety recommendations to the public. The program recommends that residents find alternate sources of gravel and avoid disturbing material that may contain erionite.

Asbestos Fines in North Dakota

Illegal handling of asbestos projects in North Dakota may result in steep fines and possibly jail time.

For example, the owner of Meide & Son pleaded guilty in 1998 to illegally removing and disposing of asbestos-containing materials during renovations to the Ben Franklin and Action Reaction Sports stores in Wahpeton, North Dakota. Jerry Meide was sentenced to 10 months in jail with one year of supervision upon release. He was also ordered to pay $200,000, which included the cost of asbestos cleanup and a $100,000 fine.

Asbestos Litigation

Despite the state’s low ranking for asbestos-related deaths, several lawsuits have stemmed from asbestos exposures in North Dakota. While North Dakotans benefit from a lengthy statute of limitations for filing asbestos claims, the state does not readily welcome cases from outside states.

A six-year statute of limitations for filing legal claims has made North Dakota an attractive venue for asbestos plaintiffs across the nation, but the North Dakota Supreme Court maintains that out-of-state asbestos claimants put an unfair burden on the state’s courts. In 2011, the state Supreme Court tossed 13 cases from its courts that missed deadlines in other states, arguing these cases placed unnecessary strain on its judges, litigants, jurors and taxpayers. The state also has a history of rejecting secondary asbestos exposure claims.

In 1997, a North Dakota jury decided Richard Anderson suffered $340,000 in damages from workplace asbestos exposures that led to his diagnosis of asbestosis. Anderson, a boiler worker who served the Minot Air Force Base from 1959 to 1985, breathed harmful fibers released from Kaylo asbestos products, including pipe covering and block insulation. The jury found Owens-Corning, the manufacturer of the Kaylo products, 25 percent responsible for Anderson’s illness, and ordered the company to pay him $85,000. Owens-Corning appealed the verdict, and the court reduced the award to $83,114.

In 1986, the Hebron Public School District in Morton County, North Dakota, filed a claim against United States Gypsum Co. to recover the cost of removing asbestos-containing ceiling plaster from two school building additions. Hebron argued that the material was added by contractors who did not disclose that asbestos materials were being used. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Hebron and awarded the school district $382,000 in compensatory damages and $450,000 in punitive damages.


Get Free Recipes for Mesothelioma Patients
Mesothelioma packet from the Mesothelioma Center
Read the Top Mesothelioma Guide for Free
Get the Compensation You Deserve

  •  
  •  
  •  
Tell us what you think
Did this article help you?
How did this article help you?
What about this article isn’t helpful for you?
Did this article help you?

Thank you for your feedback. Would you like to speak with a Patient Advocate?