Top Mesothelioma Specialists for Robotic Surgery
Since surgeons began exploring the use of robotic systems for chest cancer procedures, several accomplished mesothelioma specialists have begun to advocate for the technology.
Find a Specialist Near You
8 Results Found in
Don't see your state? Find out how our Doctor Match program can help.Learn More
What Procedures Benefit from Robotic Surgery?
For some pleural mesothelioma patients, an aggressive tumor-removing surgery such as an extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) offers the best chance of extending survival. During an EPP, surgeons remove the diseased lung, as well as parts of the tough, fibrous protective lining surrounding the heart and chest, nearby lymph nodes and part of the diaphragm if necessary.
However, EPP procedures carry great risks. The invasive procedure involves a difficult recovery period, and surgeons often discover patients are poor candidates for surgery only after making a major incision to open the chest.
Robotic Surgery Facts
- Gives surgeon a 3D-magnified view inside the patient’s body
- Allows for very precise movements using miniature robotic hands
- Enables better preoperative evaluation of cancer spread
- Reduces blood loss during aggressive tumor-removing surgery
In robotic surgery, a surgeon uses remote-control surgical tools and sees inside the patient’s body through a 3D camera. The tools and camera are mounted on little robotic arms that can fit through small incisions in the patient’s chest.
This allows the surgeon to evaluate the extent of tumor growth and minimize bleeding before making a major incision to complete the surgery. This way, patients who cannot benefit from surgery are spared an extensive procedure, and patients who can benefit have an easier recovery.
How Does Robotic Surgery Work?
Innovative robots such as the da Vinci Surgery System are designed to minimize the harmful side effects of surgery. Robotic surgery is an evolved form of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
In the VATS technique, a surgeon uses long, thin tools and a camera on a probe so they can see what they are doing without completely opening the chest. Many specialists rely on VATS to perform biopsy procedures as part of a mesothelioma diagnosis.
VATS is not ideal for more complex procedures, however, because the 2D camera eliminates the surgeon’s depth perception, and the tools are counterintuitive to use.
A robotic surgery system solves these problems by giving the surgeon a magnified 3D view and translating the surgeon’s movements into precise movements of tiny robotic hands. The surgeon can adjust the sensitivity of the controls as needed, and the system automatically filters out any tremor in the surgeon’s fingers.
The robotic systems used by mesothelioma specialists do not involve any kind of artificial intelligence — they are merely superior tools for human surgeons to use. The surgeon’s view is also projected onto screens in the operating room so the entire surgical team can collaborate during surgery.
Surgeons have used robotic tools for chest cancer procedures since 2006. In 2013, the first robotically assisted EPP was conducted using the da Vinci Surgical System.
Learn About COVID-19 and Mesothelioma
Get a free recording of the COVID-19 and mesothelioma presentation hosted by the experts at The Mesothelioma Center.Get Yours Now
Advantages for Mesothelioma
Robotic systems can significantly improve surgery for pleural mesothelioma.
Better Patient Selection
Sometimes imaging scans do not reveal the full extent of cancer spread, which can lead to a patient undergoing an aggressive procedure that does more harm than good. Remote-control robotic tools allow a surgeon to thoroughly look around inside the patient’s body before making the final decision to go ahead with the more invasive portion of the procedure.
Improved Cancer Cell Removal
With a high-definition 3D camera and tiny, computer-stabilized robotic tools, a surgeon can locate and remove cancer growth much more accurately than using only the human eye and fingers.
Reduced Blood Loss
Blood loss is a major concern in conventional EPP procedures, because it can lead to surgical complications and a more difficult recovery. With robotic tools, however, a surgeon can stop bleeding quicker and more efficiently, vastly reducing the amount of blood loss. Patients undergoing robotic surgery typically only need to spend days recovering in a hospital bed, compared to weeks with traditional surgery.
Disadvantages of Robotic Surgery
Robotic surgery systems require extensive training to operate effectively. Some experienced surgeons have no interest in learning to use these new tools, and other surgeons are skeptical that robotic systems provide significantly greater benefits than VATS techniques.
The high cost of the technology is a barrier for many hospitals and cancer centers. However, proponents believe if patients spend fewer days recovering in a hospital bed, a surgical practice can realize great savings in the long run.
In any case, until the technology becomes more widespread, patients will have to travel to one of a handful of advanced cancer centers around the country to find a surgeon with experience treating mesothelioma through robotic surgery.
10 Cited Article Sources
The sources on all content featured in The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com include medical and scientific studies, peer-reviewed studies and other research documents from reputable organizations.
Cerfolio, R. et al. (2017, September). Consensus statement on definitions and nomenclature for robotic thoracic surgery.
Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522317310851
Shen, J. (2017, June). Prof. Abbas E. Abbas: a robotic thoracic practice can provide both clinical and financial benefits for an academic institution.
Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5506173/
Louie, B. et al. (2016, September). Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic Approaches for Clinical Stage I and Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.
Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003497516301345
Nguyen, D. et al. (2015, December). Robot Assistant Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Mesothelioma.
Retrieved from: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asp/ajrs/2015/00000002/00000001/art00007
Ye, X. et al. (2015, October). Robotic thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Retrieved from: https://academic.oup.com/icvts/article/21/4/409/838977
Kumar, A. and Bin Asaf, B. (2015, January). Robotic thoracic surgery: The state of the art.
Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4290121/
Lee, B. et al. (2014, February). Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: Are there outcomes advantages?
Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522313011641
Florida Hospital Global Robotics Institute. (n.d.). Robotic Thoracic Surgery.
Retrieved from: https://www.globalroboticsinstitute.com/en/robotic-treatments/thoracic-surgery
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center. (n.d.). Robotic Surgery in Tampa, FL.
Retrieved from: https://www.floridachestsurgery.com/robotic-surgery/
- Loyola University Medical Center. (n.d.). Robotic Surgery. Retrieved from: https://www.loyolamedicine.org/surgical-services/robotic-surgery
How did this article help you?
What about this article isn’t helpful for you?
Did this article help you?
Share this article
Last Modified May 21, 2020