J&J Hit with $4.7B Verdict in Talc Asbestos Cancer Case

Legislation & Litigation
Reading Time: 3 mins
Publication Date: 07/13/2018
Fact Checked
Our fact-checking process begins with a thorough review of all sources to ensure they are high quality. Then we cross-check the facts with original medical or scientific reports published by those sources, or we validate the facts with reputable news organizations, medical and scientific experts and other health experts. Each page includes all sources for full transparency.
Reviewed

Asbestos.com is the nation’s most trusted mesothelioma resource

The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com has provided patients and their loved ones the most updated and reliable information on mesothelioma and asbestos exposure since 2006.

Our team of Patient Advocates includes a medical doctor, a registered nurse, health services administrators, veterans, VA-accredited Claims Agents, an oncology patient navigator and hospice care expert. Their combined expertise means we help any mesothelioma patient or loved one through every step of their cancer journey.

More than 30 contributors, including mesothelioma doctors, survivors, health care professionals and other experts, have peer-reviewed our website and written unique research-driven articles to ensure you get the highest-quality medical and health information.

About The Mesothelioma Center at Asbestos.com

  • Assisting mesothelioma patients and their loved ones since 2006.
  • Helps more than 50% of mesothelioma patients diagnosed annually in the U.S.
  • A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau.
  • 5-star reviewed mesothelioma and support organization.
Learn More About Us

Testimonials

"My family has only the highest compliment for the assistance and support that we received from The Mesothelioma Center. This is a staff of compassionate and knowledgeable individuals who respect what your family is experiencing and who go the extra mile to make an unfortunate diagnosis less stressful. Information and assistance were provided by The Mesothelioma Center at no cost to our family."
Lashawn
Mesothelioma patient’s daughter
  • Google Review Rating
  • BBB Review Rating

How to Cite Asbestos.com’s Article

APA

Mauney, M. (2021, February 25). J&J Hit with $4.7B Verdict in Talc Asbestos Cancer Case. Asbestos.com. Retrieved October 7, 2022, from https://www.asbestos.com/news/2018/07/13/johnson-johnson-asbestos-ovarian-cancer/

MLA

Mauney, Matt. "J&J Hit with $4.7B Verdict in Talc Asbestos Cancer Case." Asbestos.com, 25 Feb 2021, https://www.asbestos.com/news/2018/07/13/johnson-johnson-asbestos-ovarian-cancer/.

Chicago

Mauney, Matt. "J&J Hit with $4.7B Verdict in Talc Asbestos Cancer Case." Asbestos.com. Last modified February 25, 2021. https://www.asbestos.com/news/2018/07/13/johnson-johnson-asbestos-ovarian-cancer/.

johnsons baby powder

A Missouri jury Thursday ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $4.69 billion to 22 women who claim asbestos in the company’s talc products caused them to develop ovarian cancer.

It is the largest verdict to date the consumer goods giant has faced in an asbestos-talc case.

The Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis handed down $550 million in compensatory damages and $4.14 billion in punitive damages in the verdict, averaging about $25 million apiece for the 22 plaintiffs.

J&J currently faces roughly 9,000 cases that blame its talc products — including the company’s iconic Johnson’s Baby Powder — for causing cancer.

Most of the cases are related to ovarian cancer, but J&J has recently been hit with several verdicts linking its products to mesothelioma, a rare cancer caused almost exclusively by exposure to asbestos.

The company said in a statement it plans to appeal the $4.69 billion verdict and that it stands by the safety of its products.

“Johnson & Johnson is deeply disappointed in the verdict, which was the product of a fundamentally unfair process,” the company said in a statement. “Every verdict against Johnson & Johnson in this court that has gone through the appeals process has been reversed and the multiple errors present in this trial were worse than those in the prior trials which have been reversed.”

The Hidden Dangers of Talc
Talc companies have covered up the dangerous link to asbestos and mesothelioma for years.
Learn More About the Talc Cover-Up

Success with Appeals of Ovarian Cancer Cases

Johnson & Johnson has found success in appellate courts in cases linking ovarian cancer to its talc products, including a $72 million verdict in Missouri and a $417 million decision in California.

The company is actively working to overturn four other verdicts, including this week’s ruling in Missouri.

What sets the recent Missouri trial apart from the others is it alleges asbestos fibers in J&J talc products caused ovarian cancer. The other ovarian-cancer verdicts blame the talc itself for causing cancer.

In 2012, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) confirmed asbestos causes four types of cancer, including ovarian cancer. Other agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the World Health Organization have yet to confirm this link.

Meso packet
Free Mesothelioma Legal Guide
Receive a legal guide overnight. Learn how to choose an attorney and qualify for compensation.

J&J Facing More Mesothelioma Lawsuits

Johnson & Johnson hasn’t been as successful in appealing verdicts in mesothelioma cases, which claim asbestos-contaminated talcum powder led to the rare cancer.

The latest mesothelioma-talc verdict came in May, when a Los Angeles Superior Court awarded $25.7 million to Joanne Anderson, who said she developed mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos-laced baby powder.

J&J’s first loss in an asbestos-related talc lawsuit came in April, when a New Jersey jury ruled in favor of Stephen Lanzo III and his wife. J&J and talc supplier Imerys SA was ordered to pay $117 million in total damages.

A case in South Carolina ended in mistrial the same week as the Anderson verdict. Jurors couldn’t reach a unanimous decision in the case of Bertila Boyd-Bostic, who was diagnosed with pericardial mesothelioma age 30 and died 15 months later.

That case, now led by Bostic’s husband, is planned for retrial, but no date has been set.

Access Trust Funds, Grants & Compensation for Mesothelioma
Get Financial Assistance